129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21771687)
1. Effect of prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Li WH; Zhang HY; Ling Y; Jin S
Asian Pac J Trop Med; 2011 May; 4(5):409-11. PubMed ID: 21771687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prolonged second stage of labor is associated with low Apgar score.
Altman M; Sandström A; Petersson G; Frisell T; Cnattingius S; Stephansson O
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1209-15. PubMed ID: 26008749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adverse neonatal and maternal outcome following vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: does indication matter?
Salman L; Aviram A; Krispin E; Wiznitzer A; Chen R; Gabbay-Benziv R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1145-1150. PubMed ID: 28324223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perinatal outcomes of vacuum assisted versus cesarean deliveries for prolonged second stage of delivery at term
Shmueli A; Salman L; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Gabbay-Benziv R; Yogev Y; Aviram A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(8):886-889. PubMed ID: 27188481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome.
Janni W; Schiessl B; Peschers U; Huber S; Strobl B; Hantschmann P; Uhlmann N; Dimpfl T; Rammel G; Kainer F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Mar; 81(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 11966477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of stage of labor on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.
Wang L; Wang H; Jia L; Qing W; Li F; Zhou J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):596. PubMed ID: 33028253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines.
Gimovsky AC; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):361.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26928148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications associated with cesarean section in the second stage of labor.
Cebekulu L; Buchmann EJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Nov; 95(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 16934268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
Bailit JL; Grobman WA; Rice MM; Wapner RJ; Reddy UM; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Iams JD; Saade G; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):638.e1-638.e10. PubMed ID: 26596236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor.
Sung JF; Daniels KI; Brodzinsky L; El-Sayed YY; Caughey AB; Lyell DJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):306.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17826431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?
Cheng YW; Hopkins LM; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):933-8. PubMed ID: 15467567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Cheng YW; Hopkins LM; Laros RK; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):585.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17547906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes following caesarean section in second versus first stage of labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.
Rabiu KA; Adewunmi AA; Akinola OI; Eti AE; Tayo AO
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2011 Sep; 18(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 21909144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study.
Sandström A; Altman M; Cnattingius S; Johansson S; Ahlberg M; Stephansson O
J Perinatol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):236-242. PubMed ID: 27929527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between sonographic measurement of fetal head circumference and labor outcome.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Bardin R; Hiersch L; Wiznitzer A; Hadar E
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 26433468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Length of second stage of labor and preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy.
Levine LD; Srinivas SK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):535.e1-535.e4. PubMed ID: 26529372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity.
Cohen WR
Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Mar; 49(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 300151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
