271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21773806)
21. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.
Kwakkel G; Kollen BJ; Krebs HI
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 17876068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects.
Lo HS; Xie SQ
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Apr; 34(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 22051085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of smart force feedback rehabilitation robot training on upper limb motor function in the subacute stage of stroke.
Xu Q; Li C; Pan Y; Li W; Jia T; Li Z; Ma D; Pang X; Ji L
NeuroRehabilitation; 2020; 47(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 32741790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance-based robotic assistance during rhythmic arm exercises.
Leconte P; Ronsse R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 13(1):82. PubMed ID: 27623806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patients' therapy.
Poli P; Morone G; Rosati G; Masiero S
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():153872. PubMed ID: 24350244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Inter-hemispheric coupling changes associate with motor improvements after robotic stroke rehabilitation.
Pellegrino G; Tomasevic L; Tombini M; Assenza G; Bravi M; Sterzi S; Giacobbe V; Zollo L; Guglielmelli E; Cavallo G; Vernieri F; Tecchio F
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2012; 30(6):497-510. PubMed ID: 22868224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation versus physical therapy on subacute stroke patients: A follow-up study.
Franceschini M; Mazzoleni S; Goffredo M; Pournajaf S; Galafate D; Criscuolo S; Agosti M; Posteraro F
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2020 Jan; 24(1):194-198. PubMed ID: 31987544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function.
Balasubramanian S; Klein J; Burdet E
Curr Opin Neurol; 2010 Dec; 23(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 20852421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of New Technologies on Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect System.
Adomavičienė A; Daunoravičienė K; Kubilius R; Varžaitytė L; Raistenskis J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 30970655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effector force requirements to enable robotic systems to provide assisted exercise in people with upper limb impairment after stroke.
Jackson AE; Culmer PR; Levesley MC; Cozens JA; Makower SG; Bhakta BB
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975391. PubMed ID: 22275595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Contributions of robotic devices to upper limb poststroke rehabilitation].
Duret C
Rev Neurol (Paris); 2010 May; 166(5):486-93. PubMed ID: 19942243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic assessment of upper limb motor function after stroke.
Balasubramanian S; Colombo R; Sterpi I; Sanguineti V; Burdet E
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 91(11 Suppl 3):S255-69. PubMed ID: 23080041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A planar 3DOF robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and assessment.
Ball SJ; Brown IE; Scott SH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4024-7. PubMed ID: 18002882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.
Germanotta M; Cruciani A; Pecchioli C; Loreti S; Spedicato A; Meotti M; Mosca R; Speranza G; Cecchi F; Giannarelli G; Padua L; Aprile I
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 May; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 29769127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can robot-based measurements improve prediction of motor performance after robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe sub-acute stroke?
Duret C; Pila O; Grosmaire AG; Koeppel T
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2019; 37(2):119-129. PubMed ID: 30909254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Systematic review of guidelines to identify recommendations for upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke.
Morone G; Palomba A; Martino Cinnera A; Agostini M; Aprile I; Arienti C; Paci M; Casanova E; Marino D; LA Rosa G; Bressi F; Sterzi S; Gandolfi M; Giansanti D; Perrero L; Battistini A; Miccinilli S; Filoni S; Sicari M; Petrozzino S; Solaro CM; Gargano S; Benanti P; Boldrini P; Bonaiuti D; Castelli E; Draicchio F; Falabella V; Galeri S; Gimigliano F; Grigioni M; Mazzoleni S; Mazzon S; Molteni F; Petrarca M; Picelli A; Posteraro F; Senatore M; Turchetti G; Straudi S;
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Apr; 57(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 33491943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effectiveness of upper-limb robotic-assisted therapy in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke: A single-blind, randomised, controlled trial.
Dehem S; Gilliaux M; Stoquart G; Detrembleur C; Jacquemin G; Palumbo S; Frederick A; Lejeune T
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Sep; 62(5):313-320. PubMed ID: 31028900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An assessment of robot-assisted bimanual movements on upper limb motor coordination following stroke.
Lewis GN; Perreault EJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2009 Dec; 17(6):595-604. PubMed ID: 19666342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
