These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21774097)

  • 21. Change in adoption of electronic health records by US children's hospitals.
    Nakamura MM; Harper MB; Jha AK
    Pediatrics; 2013 May; 131(5):e1563-75. PubMed ID: 23589808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most.
    Adler-Milstein J; DesRoches CM; Furukawa MF; Worzala C; Charles D; Kralovec P; Stalley S; Jha AK
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Sep; 33(9):1664-71. PubMed ID: 25104826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Alternative measures of electronic health record adoption among hospitals.
    Blavin FE; Buntin MJ; Friedman CP
    Am J Manag Care; 2010 Dec; 16(12 Suppl HIT):e293-301. PubMed ID: 21322296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adoption rates of electronic health records in Turkish Hospitals and the relation with hospital sizes.
    Kose I; Rayner J; Birinci S; Ulgu MM; Yilmaz I; Guner S; ;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Oct; 20(1):967. PubMed ID: 33087106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of the HITECH financial incentives on EHR adoption in small, physician-owned practices.
    Cohen MF
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Oct; 94():143-54. PubMed ID: 27573322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records.
    Bramble JD; Galt KA; Siracuse MV; Abbott AA; Drincic A; Paschal KA; Fuji KT
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2010; 35(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 20010013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. EHR acceptance factors in ambulatory care: a survey of physician perceptions.
    Morton ME; Wiedenbeck S
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2010 Jan; 7(Winter):1c. PubMed ID: 20697466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hospitals ineligible for federal meaningful-use incentives have dismally low rates of adoption of electronic health records.
    Wolf L; Harvell J; Jha AK
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Mar; 31(3):505-13. PubMed ID: 22392661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diffusion dynamics of electronic health records: A longitudinal observational study comparing data from hospitals in Germany and the United States.
    Esdar M; Hüsers J; Weiß JP; Rauch J; Hübner U
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Nov; 131():103952. PubMed ID: 31557699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Typical electronic health record use in primary care practices and the quality of diabetes care.
    Crosson JC; Ohman-Strickland PA; Cohen DJ; Clark EC; Crabtree BF
    Ann Fam Med; 2012; 10(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 22585886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electronic health record adoption and health information exchange among hospitals in New York State.
    Abramson EL; McGinnis S; Edwards A; Maniccia DM; Moore J; Kaushal R;
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 18(6):1156-62. PubMed ID: 21914089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018.
    Classen DC; Holmgren AJ; Co Z; Newmark LP; Seger D; Danforth M; Bates DW
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205547. PubMed ID: 32469412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does electronic health record use improve hospital financial performance? Evidence from panel data.
    Collum TH; Menachemi N; Sen B
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2016; 41(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 26052785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electronic Health Record Use a Bitter Pill for Many Physicians.
    Meigs SL; Solomon M
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2016; 13(Winter):1d. PubMed ID: 26903782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Environmental market factors associated with electronic health record adoption among cancer hospitals.
    Tarver WL; Menachemi N
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2018; 43(4):303-314. PubMed ID: 28225447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing the Trends of Electronic Health Record Adoption Among Hospitals of the United States and Japan.
    Kanakubo T; Kharrazi H
    J Med Syst; 2019 Jun; 43(7):224. PubMed ID: 31187293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013.
    Hsiao CJ; Hing E
    NCHS Data Brief; 2014 Jan; (143):1-8. PubMed ID: 24439138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hospital adoption of interoperability functions.
    Thompson MP; Graetz I
    Healthc (Amst); 2019 Sep; 7(3):100347. PubMed ID: 30595558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electronic Health Record Adoption among Obstetrician/Gynecologists in the United States: Physician Practices and Satisfaction.
    Raglan GB; Margolis B; Paulus RA; Schulkin J
    J Healthc Qual; 2017; 39(3):144-152. PubMed ID: 28481842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does adoption of electronic health records improve the quality of care management in France? Results from the French e-SI (PREPS-SIPS) study.
    Plantier M; Havet N; Durand T; Caquot N; Amaz C; Biron P; Philip I; Perrier L
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jun; 102():156-165. PubMed ID: 28495344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.