These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21774278)

  • 1. New assisted reproductive technology laws in Victoria: a genuine overhaul or just cut and paste?
    Thorpe R; Petersen K; Pitts MK; Baker HW
    J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):835-50. PubMed ID: 21774278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reviewing regulation of assisted reproductive technology in New South Wales: the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW).
    Smith M
    J Law Med; 2008 Aug; 16(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 18807800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction.
    Gürtin ZB
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):555-64. PubMed ID: 21962527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive technologies: professional and legal restrictions in Australian clinics.
    Petersen K; Baker HW; Pitts M; Thorpe R
    J Law Med; 2005 Feb; 12(3):373-85. PubMed ID: 15754559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems with the regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a clinician's perspective.
    Baker HW
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 12194477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulating assisted reproductive technologies in Victoria: the impact of changing policy concerning the accessibility of in vitro fertilisation for preimplantation tissue-typing.
    Smith MK
    J Law Med; 2012 Jun; 19(4):820-34. PubMed ID: 22908622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (Law 40/2004).
    Fineschi V; Neri M; Turillazzi E
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Sep; 31(9):536-9. PubMed ID: 16131556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Redefining family: should lesbians have access to assisted reproduction?
    Dower T
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 2001 Aug; 25(2):466-80. PubMed ID: 12778927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Access to assisted reproductive technology for cancer patients in Australia.
    McConnell R; Stankiewicz M; Koczwara B
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 7(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 21585691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing stakeholder needs for the introduction of assisted reproductive technology legislation.
    Petrillo T
    J Law Med; 2009 Aug; 17(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 19771994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Submission on draft legislation on assisted human reproduction.
    Canadian Bar Association. National Health Law and Family Law Sections
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 10(2):25-9. PubMed ID: 15739308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ever-widening gap between the science of artificial reproductive technology and the laws which govern that technology.
    Havins WE; Dalessio JJ
    De Paul Law Rev; 1999; 48(4):825-66. PubMed ID: 12484397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where does a man stand on issues of assisted reproduction, surrogacy, artificial insemination within lesbian relationships and posthumous conception?
    Beem P
    Aust J Fam Law; 2004 Apr; 18(1):41-62. PubMed ID: 17058336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulation of donor conception and the "time to tell" campaign.
    Johnson L; Kane H
    J Law Med; 2007 Aug; 15(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 17902494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of feminist opposition to reproductive technology: a case study in Victoria, Australia.
    Woll L
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 11651331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies, surrogacy, same sex couple parenting].
    Belaisch Allart J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Aug; 40 Suppl 1():3-7. PubMed ID: 23141591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical and legal challenges.
    Waxman J; Morrison J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):1032; author reply 1032-3. PubMed ID: 18331735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Professional self-regulation and guidelines in assisted reproduction.
    Chalmers D
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):414-28. PubMed ID: 12194473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New Turkish legislation on assisted reproductive techniques and centres: a step in the right direction?
    Urman B; Yakin K
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Dec; 21(6):729-31. PubMed ID: 21044867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in South America and the effect on adoption.
    Marques CL
    Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):65-91. PubMed ID: 12656082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.