These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21775236)

  • 1. Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 21775236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 19833464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint Bayesian analysis of forensic mixtures.
    Pascali VL; Merigioli S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):735-48. PubMed ID: 22948016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian networks and probabilistic reasoning about scientific evidence when there is a lack of data.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):163-7. PubMed ID: 16271838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision-theoretic analysis of forensic sampling criteria using bayesian decision networks.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Garbolino P; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):217-27. PubMed ID: 23031501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning about Bayesian networks for forensic interpretation: an example based on the 'the problem of multiple propositions'.
    Biedermann A; Voisard R; Taroni F
    Sci Justice; 2012 Sep; 52(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 22841144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FINEX: a Probabilistic Expert System for forensic identification.
    Cowell RG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Jul; 134(2-3):196-206. PubMed ID: 12850417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies.
    Hepler AB; Weir BS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 19079769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 10795411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Legal perceptions of forensic DNA profiling part I: a review of the legal literature.
    Walsh SJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Dec; 155(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 16216711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of reverse engineering gene regulatory networks with relevance networks, graphical gaussian models and bayesian networks.
    Werhli AV; Grzegorczyk M; Husmeier D
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2523-31. PubMed ID: 16844710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two items of evidence, no putative source: an inference problem in forensic intelligence.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Biedermann A
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1350-61. PubMed ID: 17199621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal estimation and identification in American and East European populations.
    Kimmerle EH; Jantz RL; Konigsberg LW; Baraybar JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 May; 53(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 18471195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence.
    Thompson WC; Taroni F; Aitken CG
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 12570198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On statistical analysis of forensic DNA: theory, methods and computer programs.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ; Chung YK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):17-23. PubMed ID: 16870375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of forensic DNA testing in the legal system.
    Primorac D; Schanfield MS
    Croat Med J; 2000 Mar; 41(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 10810166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 9800433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A probabilistic approach to the joint evaluation of firearm evidence and gunshot residues.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Nov; 163(1-2):18-33. PubMed ID: 16332419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.