These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. General validity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry. Klink PC; van Ee R; van Wezel RJ PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3473. PubMed ID: 18941522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contradictory influence of context on predominance during binocular rivalry. Carter OL; Campbell TG; Liu GB; Wallis G Clin Exp Optom; 2004 May; 87(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 15186206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A hierarchical model of perceptual multistability involving interocular grouping. Wang Y; Kilpatrick ZP; Josić K J Comput Neurosci; 2020 May; 48(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 32338341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 'laws' of binocular rivalry: 50 years of Levelt's propositions. Brascamp JW; Klink PC; Levelt WJ Vision Res; 2015 Apr; 109(Pt A):20-37. PubMed ID: 25749677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ring models of binocular rivalry and fusion. Wang Z; Dai W; McLaughlin DW J Comput Neurosci; 2020 May; 48(2):193-211. PubMed ID: 32363561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binocular rivalry from luminance and contrast. Qiu SX; Caldwell CL; You JY; Mendola JD Vision Res; 2020 Oct; 175():41-50. PubMed ID: 32693182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Levelt's laws do not predict perception when luminance- and contrast-modulated stimuli compete during binocular rivalry. Skerswetat J; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14432. PubMed ID: 30258060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. Brascamp JW; van Ee R; Noest AJ; Jacobs RH; van den Berg AV J Vis; 2006 Oct; 6(11):1244-56. PubMed ID: 17209732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics. van Boxtel JJ; van Ee R; Erkelens CJ J Vis; 2007 Nov; 7(14):3.1-11. PubMed ID: 18217798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. Moreno-Bote R; Shpiro A; Rinzel J; Rubin N J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):1. PubMed ID: 20884496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of voluntary and involuntary attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. Hancock S; Andrews TJ Perception; 2007; 36(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 17402669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Freeman AW J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4412-20. PubMed ID: 16148271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eye dominance alternations in binocular rivalry do not require visual awareness. Platonov A; Goossens J J Vis; 2014 Sep; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 25183877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry. Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1798-803. PubMed ID: 18585751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Knapen T; Paffen C; Kanai R; van Ee R Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17083956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry. Conrad V; Bartels A; Kleiner M; Noppeney U J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):27. PubMed ID: 20884492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]