These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21775791)

  • 1. Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital radiography.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5099-118. PubMed ID: 21775791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
    Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Pattacini P; Ginocchi V; Iori M
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of effective detective quantum efficiency for a photon counting scanning mammography system and comparison with two flat panel full-field digital mammography systems.
    Wood TJ; Moore CS; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025025. PubMed ID: 29260730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems.
    Samei E; Lo JY; Yoshizumi TT; Jesneck JL; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; McAdams HP; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 15845791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; MacKenzie A; Honey ID; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3806-17. PubMed ID: 19746814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101916. PubMed ID: 24089918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients.
    Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of varying X-ray tube voltage and additional filtration on image quality and patient dose in digital radiography system.
    E A; A Y; T O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Sep; 199():110893. PubMed ID: 37321050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
    Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose optimization for different medical imaging tasks from exposure index, exposure control factor, and MAS in digital radiography.
    Zhang M; Zhao B; Wang Y; Chen W; Hou L
    Health Phys; 2012 Sep; 103(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 22850227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
    Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.