122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21776561)
1. Cervical disc replacement shows compelling difference in adjacent-level ossification development.
Hart RA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):e76. PubMed ID: 21776561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the incidence and clinical effect of the heterotopic ossification in a single-level cervical artificial disc replacement.
Lee JH; Jung TG; Kim HS; Jang JS; Lee SH
Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):676-82. PubMed ID: 20537598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double-level cervical total disc replacement for adjacent segment disease: is it a useful treatment? Description of late onset heterotopic ossification and review of the literature.
Barbagallo GM; Certo F; Visocchi M; Sciacca G; Albanese V
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(1 Suppl):15-23. PubMed ID: 24825036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjacent-level cervical ossification after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Garrido BJ; Wilhite J; Nakano M; Crawford C; Baldus C; Riew KD; Sasso RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1185-9. PubMed ID: 21776570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: determination by CT and effects on clinical outcomes.
Tu TH; Wu JC; Huang WC; Guo WY; Wu CL; Shih YH; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Apr; 14(4):457-65. PubMed ID: 21294610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty: outcome and intraoperative findings following explantation of 22 cervical disc prostheses.
Brenke C; Scharf J; Schmieder K; Barth M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Aug; 17(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 22657947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement.
Mehren C; Suchomel P; Grochulla F; Barsa P; Sourkova P; Hradil J; Korge A; Mayer HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2802-6. PubMed ID: 17108833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the Bryan and Prodisc-C devices.
Ryu KS; Park CK; Jun SC; Huh HY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 20809721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of effectiveness and incidence of heterotopic ossification after single-level Bryan cervical artificial disc replacement].
Liu W; Zhu B; Liu X; Sun Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 26(6):699-702. PubMed ID: 22792767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and radiological follow-up of single-level Prestige LP cervical disc replacement.
Chen F; Yang J; Ni B; Guo Q; Lu X; Xie N
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Apr; 133(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 23392650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc: long-term X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up results.
Zhao YB; Sun Y; Chen ZQ; Liu ZJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Nov; 123(21):2999-3002. PubMed ID: 21162945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longer plate-to-disc distance prevents adjacent-level ossification development but does not influence adjacent-segment degeneration.
Yang H; Lu X; He H; Yuan W; Wang X; Liao X; Chen D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):E388-93. PubMed ID: 25627288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass.
Jin YJ; Park SB; Kim MJ; Kim KJ; Kim HJ
Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):408-20. PubMed ID: 23332520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [X-ray epidemiology of ligaments ossifications and disc degeneration of the cervical spine].
Albisinni U; Merlini L; Terayama K; Ohtsuka K; Savini R
Chir Organi Mov; 1985; 70(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3933922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Devine J; Williams E; Yu-Yahiro J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 12902954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of carpentry on heterotopic ossification and mobility in cervical arthroplasty: determination by computed tomography with a minimum 2-year follow-up: Clinical article.
Tu TH; Wu JC; Huang WC; Wu CL; Ko CC; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 22462570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Influence of intraoperative cervical posture in single segmental cervical disc replacement on restoration of cervical curve in neutral position].
Hong Y; Deng Y; Liu H; Gong R; An L; Gong Q; Li T; Song Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 27(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 23427495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
Quan GM; Vital JM; Hansen S; Pointillart V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(8):639-46. PubMed ID: 21178838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
