672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21776571)
1. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.
Zhang GQ; Chen JY; Chai W; Liu M; Wang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1190-6. PubMed ID: 21776571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Lo NN; Chia KU; Chong HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 18171951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total knee arthroplasty with use of computer-assisted navigation compared with conventional guiding systems in the same patient: radiographic results in Asian patients.
Huang TW; Hsu WH; Peng KT; Hsu RW; Weng YJ; Shen WJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1197-202. PubMed ID: 21776572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 29389753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An accelerometer-based portable navigation system improved prosthetic alignment after total knee arthroplasty in 3D measurements.
Ueyama H; Minoda Y; Sugama R; Ohta Y; Yamamura K; Nakamura S; Takemura S; Nakamura H
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 May; 27(5):1580-1586. PubMed ID: 30066018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Coronal Prosthetic Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using 3 Computer-Assisted Navigation Systems.
Sasaki H; Ishida K; Shibanuma N; Takayama K; Hayashi S; Hashimoto S; Niikura T; Kurosaka M; Kuroda R; Matsumoto T
Orthopedics; 2018 Sep; 41(5):e621-e628. PubMed ID: 30011056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Extra-Articular Deformity: Restoration of Mechanical Alignment Using Accelerometer-Based Navigation System.
Matassi F; Cozzi Lepri A; Innocenti M; Zanna L; Civinini R; Innocenti M
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):676-681. PubMed ID: 30685259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Blakeney WG; Khan RJ; Wall SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(15):1377-84. PubMed ID: 21915542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
Cheng T; Zhang G; Zhang X
J Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 171(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 21176919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements.
Parratte S; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92(12):2143-9. PubMed ID: 20844155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Clinical Outcome of Computer-Navigated Compared with Conventional Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Study.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jun; 99(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28632587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Choi Y; Kwon OR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 91(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 19122074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique.
Chin PL; Yang KY; Yeo SJ; Lo NN
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Aug; 20(5):618-26. PubMed ID: 16309998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional versus computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized study.
Todesca A; Garro L; Penna M; Bejui-Hugues J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jun; 25(6):1778-1783. PubMed ID: 27306985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation.
Matziolis G; Krocker D; Weiss U; Tohtz S; Perka C
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Feb; 89(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 17272435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Kinematic navigation in total knee replacement--experience from the first 50 cases.
Chang CW; Yang CY
J Formos Med Assoc; 2006 Jun; 105(6):468-74. PubMed ID: 16801034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized study comparing navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Selvanayagam R; Kumar V; Malhotra R; Srivastava DN; Digge VK
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019848079. PubMed ID: 31117880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
