830 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21776773)
1. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of fractionation correction methodologies for multiple phase treatment plans in radiation therapy.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Papanikolaou N; Lopes Mdo C
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031715. PubMed ID: 23464310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiobiologic comparison of helical tomotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, and conformal radiotherapy in treating lung cancer accounting for secondary malignancy risks.
Komisopoulos G; Mavroidis P; Rodriguez S; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N; Nikiforidis GC; Sakellaropoulos GC
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 25168596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning.
Appenzoller LM; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Mutic S; Moore KL
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7446-61. PubMed ID: 23231294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the 3D-conformal, helical tomotherapy and multileaf collimators-based intensity modulated radiotherapy modalities using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Costa Ferreira B; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
J BUON; 2008; 13(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 18404791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiobiological and dosimetric analysis of daily megavoltage CT registration on adaptive radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy.
Mavroidis P; Su FC; Giantsoudi D; Stathakis S; Komisopoulos G; Shi C; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 10(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21214283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric advantages of IMRT simultaneous integrated boost for high-risk prostate cancer.
Li XA; Wang JZ; Jursinic PA; Lawton CA; Wang D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1251-7. PubMed ID: 15752907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh.
Hong L; Alektiar KM; Hunt M; Venkatraman E; Leibel SA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(3):752-9. PubMed ID: 15183478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram.
Stasi M; Bresciani S; Miranti A; Maggio A; Sapino V; Gabriele P
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7626-34. PubMed ID: 23231310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of four consensus guidelines and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-CRT versus tomotherapy IMRT.
Malone S; Croke J; Roustan-Delatour N; Belanger E; Avruch L; Malone C; Morash C; Kayser C; Underhill K; Li Y; Malone K; Nyiri B; Spaans J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):725-32. PubMed ID: 22444999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of benchmark dose-volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer.
Luo C; Yang CC; Narayan S; Stern RL; Perks J; Goldberg Z; Ryu J; Purdy JA; Vijayakumar S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(4):1253-62. PubMed ID: 17145540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose.
Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Liu HH; Dong L; Mohan R; Wu Y
Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 15984690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "SABER": A new software tool for radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation.
Zhao B; Joiner MC; Orton CG; Burmeister J
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5586-92. PubMed ID: 21158270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpretation of the dosimetric results of three uniformity regularization methods in terms of expected treatment outcome.
Mavroidis P; Komisopoulos G; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5009-18. PubMed ID: 19070235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of pancreatic cancer tumors with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using the volume at risk approach (VARA): employing dose-volume histogram (DVH) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) to evaluate small bowel toxicity.
Landry JC; Yang GY; Ting JY; Staley CA; Torres W; Esiashvili N; Davis LW
Med Dosim; 2002; 27(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 12074463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. IMRT: improvement in treatment planning efficiency using NTCP calculation independent of the dose-volume-histogram.
Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Grigorov L; Jiang R; Barnett RB
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1250-8. PubMed ID: 16752559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
