382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21777599)
1. Visually and memory-guided grasping: aperture shaping exhibits a time-dependent scaling to Weber's law.
Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G; Heath M
Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1941-8. PubMed ID: 21777599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The visual coding of grip aperture shows an early but not late adherence to Weber's law.
Heath M; Mulla A; Holmes SA; Smuskowitz LR
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 490(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 21194553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical constraints do not influence pantomime-grasping adherence to Weber's law: A reply to Utz et al. (2015).
Manzone J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Whitwell RL; Heath M
Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():31-35. PubMed ID: 27876512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grasping time does not influence the early adherence of aperture shaping to Weber's law.
Heath M; Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G
Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():332. PubMed ID: 23267323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distinct visual cues mediate aperture shaping for grasping and pantomime-grasping tasks.
Holmes SA; Lohmus J; McKinnon S; Mulla A; Heath M
J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 23971991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Goal-directed grasping: the dimensional properties of an object influence the nature of the visual information mediating aperture shaping.
Holmes SA; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 23501700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Weber's law in tactile grasping and manual estimation: feedback-dependent evidence for functionally distinct processing streams.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():32-41. PubMed ID: 24556320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
Ozana A; Ganel T
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hand anthropometry and the limits of aperture separation determine the utility of Weber's law in grasping and manual estimation.
Ayala N; Binsted G; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2439-2446. PubMed ID: 29923096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Grasping Weber's illusion: the effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):951-67. PubMed ID: 19378413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Manual estimations of functionally graspable target objects adhere to Weber's law.
Heath M; Manzone J
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 28280878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Yau M; Westwood DA; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2029-40. PubMed ID: 25869741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grasping without vision: time normalizing grip aperture profiles yields spurious grip scaling to target size.
Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1878-87. PubMed ID: 23796704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Action is immune to the effects of Weber's law throughout the entire grasping trajectory.
Ganel T; Freud E; Meiran N
J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Both vision-for-perception and vision-for-action follow Weber's law at small object sizes, but violate it at larger sizes.
Bruno N; Uccelli S; Viviani E; de'Sperati C
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():327-334. PubMed ID: 27553269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.
Hosang S; Chan J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):945-54. PubMed ID: 26680769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.
Heath M; Manzone J; Khan M; Davarpanah Jazi S
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 28721517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Memory delay and haptic feedback influence the dissociation of tactile cues for perception and action.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Hosang S; Heath M
Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():91-100. PubMed ID: 25796409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inferences about time course of Weber's Law violate statistical principles.
Foster RM; Franz VH
Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 78():56-60. PubMed ID: 23246322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND.
Bhatia K; Löwenkamp C; Franz VH
J Vis; 2022 Nov; 22(12):13. PubMed ID: 36374493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
