151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21777717)
1. Variability of judgments of capacity: experience of capacity evaluators in a study of research consent capacity.
Kim SY; Appelbaum PS; Kim HM; Wall IF; Bourgeois JA; Frankel B; Hails KC; Rundell JR; Seibel KM; Karlawish JH
Psychosomatics; 2011; 52(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 21777717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preservation of the capacity to appoint a proxy decision maker: implications for dementia research.
Kim SY; Karlawish JH; Kim HM; Wall IF; Bozoki AC; Appelbaum PS
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2011 Feb; 68(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 21300949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease.
Marson DC; McInturff B; Hawkins L; Bartolucci A; Harrell LE
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 9100714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neuropsychological correlates of capacity determinations in Alzheimer disease: implications for assessment.
Palmer BW; Ryan KA; Kim HM; Karlawish JH; Appelbaum PS; Kim SY
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2013 Apr; 21(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 23498384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consistency of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Marson DC; Earnst KS; Jamil F; Bartolucci A; Harrell LE
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Aug; 48(8):911-8. PubMed ID: 10968294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive models that predict physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease.
Marson DC; Hawkins L; McInturff B; Harrell LE
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):458-64. PubMed ID: 9100715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer's disease in providing informed consent for participation in research.
Kim SY; Caine ED; Currier GW; Leibovici A; Ryan JM
Am J Psychiatry; 2001 May; 158(5):712-7. PubMed ID: 11329391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpreting the clinical significance of capacity scores for informed consent in Alzheimer disease clinical trials.
Karlawish J; Kim SY; Knopman D; van Dyck CH; James BD; Marson D
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2008 Jul; 16(7):568-74. PubMed ID: 18556397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive models of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Earnst KS; Marson DC; Harrell LE
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Aug; 48(8):919-27. PubMed ID: 10968295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do Consultation Psychiatrists, Forensic Psychiatrists, Psychiatry Trainees, and Health Care Lawyers Differ in Opinion on Gray Area Decision-Making Capacity Cases? A Vignette-Based Survey.
Armontrout J; Gitlin D; Gutheil T
Psychosomatics; 2016; 57(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27400660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ability of persons with Alzheimer disease (AD) to make a decision about taking an AD treatment.
Karlawish JH; Casarett DJ; James BD; Xie SX; Kim SY
Neurology; 2005 May; 64(9):1514-9. PubMed ID: 15883310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Older adults' attitudes toward enrollment of non-competent subjects participating in Alzheimer's research.
Karlawish J; Rubright J; Casarett D; Cary M; Ten Have T; Sankar P
Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Feb; 166(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 18923066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research with Alzheimer's disease subjects: informed consent and proxy decision making.
High DM
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1992 Sep; 40(9):950-7. PubMed ID: 1512393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives.
Kim SY; Appelbaum PS
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 16883617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variable judgments of decisional capacity in cognitively impaired research subjects.
Stocking CB; Hougham GW; Danner DD; Patterson MB; Whitehouse PJ; Sachs GA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2008 Oct; 56(10):1893-7. PubMed ID: 19054202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The views of Alzheimer disease patients and their study partners on proxy consent for clinical trial enrollment.
Karlawish J; Kim SY; Knopman D; van Dyck CH; James BD; Marson D
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2008 Mar; 16(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 18310554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of mental capacity to consent to treatment in anorexia nervosa: A comparison of clinical judgment and MacCAT-T and consequences for clinical practice.
Elzakkers IFFM; Danner UN; Grisso T; Hoek HW; van Elburg AA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 58():27-35. PubMed ID: 29853010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement between instruments for rating treatment decisional capacity.
Gurrera RJ; Karel MJ; Azar AR; Moye J
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2007 Feb; 15(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 17272738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research?
Kim SY; Kim HM; McCallum C; Tariot PN
Neurology; 2005 Nov; 65(9):1395-401. PubMed ID: 16275826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impaired decision-making ability in subjects with Alzheimer's disease and willingness to participate in research.
Kim SY; Cox C; Caine ED
Am J Psychiatry; 2002 May; 159(5):797-802. PubMed ID: 11986134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
