105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21778307)
1. High-frequency breast ultrasound for the detection of microcalcifications and associated masses in BI-RADS 4a patients.
Stöblen F; Landt S; Ishaq R; Stelkens-Gebhardt R; Rezai M; Skaane P; Blohmer JU; Sehouli J; Kümmel S
Anticancer Res; 2011 Aug; 31(8):2575-81. PubMed ID: 21778307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Detection of microcalcifications by high-resolution B-mode sonography in patients with BI-RADS 4a lesions].
Stöblen F; Landt S; Köninger A; Hecktor J; Kimmig R; Kümmel S
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2009; 49(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 20530944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.
Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories.
Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ultrasound examination of breast microcalcifications: luxury or necessity?].
Balu-Maestro C; Chapellier C; Ben Taaritt I; Fournol M
J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 87(12 Pt 1):1849-58. PubMed ID: 17213769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications.
Bennani-Baiti B; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188679. PubMed ID: 29190656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy.
Burnside ES; Ochsner JE; Fowler KJ; Fine JP; Salkowski LR; Rubin DL; Sisney GA
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 17255409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review.
Patterson SK; Neal CH; Jeffries DO; Joe A; Klein K; Bailey J; Pinsky R; Paramagul C; Watcharotone K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 25151294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.
Kettritz U; Morack G; Decker T
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 16036159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Trop I; Chopier J; David J; Lalonde L; Darai E; Rouzier R; Uzan S
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 21771958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
