These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21779015)

  • 1. Calculating the error in refractive error.
    Taylor RH; Ellingham RB; Subramaniam S; Wakely LA
    Eye (Lond); 2011 Oct; 25(10):1333-6. PubMed ID: 21779015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical applications of power vectors.
    Miller JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):599-602. PubMed ID: 19390467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The analysis of refractive error of long axial high myopic eyes after IOL implantation].
    Zheng Q; Zhao Z; Lian H; Zhao Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 51(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 26081231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations.
    Thibos LN; Hong X; Bradley A; Applegate RA
    J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):329-51. PubMed ID: 15134480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Macular illumination tests in various refractive states of the eye.
    Paul SD; Singh K
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1971 Sep; 19(3):102-7. PubMed ID: 15744979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.
    Nguyen MT; Berntsen DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):886-893. PubMed ID: 28727613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community.
    Marmamula S; Keeffe JE; Narsaiah S; Khanna RC; Rao GN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 24909916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new subjective refraction method--the meridional polarized vernier optometer.
    Salmon TO; Horner DG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):599-605. PubMed ID: 8942132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the appropriate gold standard test for refractive error?
    Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):115-117. PubMed ID: 28211178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism.
    Holladay JT; Moran JR; Kezirian GM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Jan; 27(1):61-79. PubMed ID: 11165858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative measurements of optical low-coherence reflectometry biometry and assessment of its refractive predictability.
    Akalın İ; Tüfek M; Türkyılmaz M; Öztürk F
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 39(6):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 29931570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective refraction from monochromatic wavefront aberrations via Zernike power polynomials.
    Robert Iskander D; Davis BA; Collins MJ; Franklin R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 17470237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
    du Toit R; Soong K; Brian G; Ramke J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of objective and subjective refraction before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Salchow DJ; Zirm ME; Stieldorf C; Parisi A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Jun; 25(6):827-35. PubMed ID: 10374165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical ocular wavefront analyzers.
    Cerviño A; Hosking SL; Montes-Mico R; Bates K
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 23(6):603-16. PubMed ID: 17598581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing homatropine and atropine in pediatric cycloplegic refractions.
    Shah BM; Sharma P; Menon V; Saxena R; Singh JP
    J AAPOS; 2011 Jun; 15(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 21777797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
    Sachdev N; Cairns G; McGhee CN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):9; author reply 9-10. PubMed ID: 15630398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
    Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference axis selection: subcommittee report of the OSA Working Group to establish standards for measurement and reporting of optical aberrations of the eye.
    Applegate RA; Thibos LN; Bradley A; Marcos S; Roorda A; Salmon TO; Atchison DA
    J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(5):S656-8. PubMed ID: 11019894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.