These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21779636)

  • 1. Semi-automatic measurement of visual verticality perception in humans reveals a new category of visual field dependency.
    Kaleff CR; Aschidamini C; Baron J; Di Leone CN; Canavarro S; Vargas CD
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2011 Aug; 44(8):754-61. PubMed ID: 21779636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of visual field dependence: comparison between the mechanical 3D rod-and-frame test developed by Oltman in 1968 with a 2D computer-based version.
    Isableu B; Gueguen M; Fourré B; Giraudet G; Amorim MA
    J Vestib Res; 2008; 18(5-6):239-47. PubMed ID: 19542598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of verticality perception by a rod-and-frame test: preliminary observations on the use of a computer monitor and video eye glasses.
    Bagust J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 May; 86(5):1062-4. PubMed ID: 15895360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing of proprioceptive and vestibular body signals and self-transcendence in Ashtanga yoga practitioners.
    Fiori F; David N; Aglioti SM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():734. PubMed ID: 25278866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian Account of Visual-Vestibular Interactions in the Rod-and-Frame Task.
    Alberts BB; de Brouwer AJ; Selen LP; Medendorp WP
    eNeuro; 2016; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 27844055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of verticality is altered in people with severe chronic low back pain compared to healthy controls: A cross-sectional study.
    Alrwaily M; Sparto PJ; Whitney SL
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2020 Feb; 45():102074. PubMed ID: 31672595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Young children's Rod-and-Frame Test performance.
    Haywood K; Teeple J; Givens M; Patterson J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 905075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum repetitions for stable measures of visual dependency using the dot version of the computer-based Rod-Frame test.
    Takasaki H; Treleaven J; Johnston V; Jull G
    Man Ther; 2012 Oct; 17(5):466-9. PubMed ID: 22425587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The right temporoparietal junction plays a causal role in maintaining the internal representation of verticality.
    Fiori F; Candidi M; Acciarino A; David N; Aglioti SM
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 114(5):2983-90. PubMed ID: 26400254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of field-dependent and field-independent subjects on a rod and frame discrimination task.
    Byrd GR; Paige SM; Guyot GW; Heck V
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1089-92. PubMed ID: 2399084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The field dependence/independence cognitive style does not control the spatial perception of elevation.
    Hudson TE; Li W; Matin L
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Apr; 68(3):377-92. PubMed ID: 16900831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical) in peripheral and central vestibular disorders.
    Bisdorff AR; Wolsley CJ; Anastasopoulos D; Bronstein AM; Gresty MA
    Brain; 1996 Oct; 119 ( Pt 5)():1523-34. PubMed ID: 8931577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Augmented asymmetrical visual field dependence in asymptomatic diabetics: evidence of subclinical asymmetrical bilateral vestibular dysfunction.
    Razzak RA; Bagust J; Docherty S; Hussein W; Al-Otaibi A
    J Diabetes Complications; 2015; 29(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 25301547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control.
    Isableu B; Ohlmann T; Crémieux J; Amblard B
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 May; 150(2):208-21. PubMed ID: 12677318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Verticality Perception in Spinal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Obrero-Gaitán E; Molina F; Del-Pino-Casado R; Ibáñez-Vera AJ; Rodríguez-Almagro D; Lomas-Vega R
    J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32503240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field-dependence, extraversion and perception of the vertical: empirical and theoretical perspectives of the rod-and-frame test.
    Fine BJ; Danforth AV
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Jun; 40(3):683-93. PubMed ID: 1178347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of verticality on a modified portable Rod-and frame Test.
    Handel A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Apr; 34(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 5021793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postural balance, visual verticality perception, and its association in individuals with and without neck pain.
    Hiengkaew V; Panichaporn W; Thanungkul S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Jul; 97 Suppl 7():S70-4. PubMed ID: 25141531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rod and frame test and posture under optokinetic stimulation used to explore two complementary aspects of the visual influence in postural control after stroke.
    Tasseel-Ponche S; Le Liepvre H; Colle F; Andriantsifanetra C; Vidal PP; Bonan IV; Yelnik AP
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():171-175. PubMed ID: 28783558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of the vertical with a head-mounted visual frame during head tilt.
    Mars F; Vercher JL; Blouin J
    Ergonomics; 2004 Aug; 47(10):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15370867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.