These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21779747)

  • 1. [Clinical evaluation of implant anchorage with segmental arch technique on the elongated teeth and tilted teeth].
    He X; Tian LG; Mao YL; Wang JW
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Jun; 20(3):321-3. PubMed ID: 21779747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uprighting a mesially tilted mandibular left second molar with anchorage from a dental implant.
    Zhou J; Gan X; Han X; Razzoog ME; Zhu Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):50-53. PubMed ID: 31113665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage in initial orthodontic retraction.
    Wahabuddin S; Mascarenhas R; Iqbal M; Husain A
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Feb; 41(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mini-implant-supported sliding jig.
    Pattabiraman V; Kumari S; Sood R
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 22299112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical evaluation on surgical implant anchorage in orthodontic and prosthodontic therapy].
    Zhou Q; Liang R; Shen BY; Xiao Y; Zhang XW; Lan WH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Aug; 14(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 16155713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extraction treatment using a palatal implant for anchorage.
    Giancotti A; Greco M; Docimo R; Arcuri C
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 14703333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support.
    Krekmanov L; Kahn M; Rangert B; Lindström H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 10874806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical application of miniscrew implant for maximum anchorage cases].
    Xun CL; Zeng XL; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Nov; 39(6):505-8. PubMed ID: 15854326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A three-dimensional finite element analysis for the biomechanical characteristics of orthodontic anchorage micro-implant].
    Zhang Y; Zhang D; Feng CJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Jun; 14(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 15995777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Pavithranand A; Rajasigamani K; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 16627183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induced ankylosis of a primary molar for skeletal anchorage in the mandible as alternative to mini-implants.
    Angelopoulou MV; Koletsi D; Vadiakas G; Halazonetis DJ
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():18. PubMed ID: 26085484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Divergence correction associated with implant placement: a radiographic study.
    Mayer Y; Machtei EE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1033-9. PubMed ID: 20162106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microscrew implant anchorage sliding mechanics.
    Park HS; Kwon OW; Sung JH
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 16164110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrusion of molars with implants as anchorage: a report of two cases.
    Kato S; Kato M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 16774596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
    Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.