These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21780543)

  • 1. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term.
    Chitrakar NS
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2012 Jan; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 22929629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone].
    Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
    Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
    Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical study on dinoprostone suppositories 0.8 mm used in cervical ripening and labor induction of women with term pregnancy of premature rupture of the membranes: a multicenter study].
    Zou LY; Fan L; Duan T; Wang ZL; Ma RM
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 21029599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary.
    D'Aniello G; Bocchi C; Florio P; Ignacchiti E; Guidoni CG; Centini G; Cito G; Picciolini E; Severi FM; Petraglia F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
    Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS
    BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of misoprostol or prostaglandin E(2) for induction of labor on the incidence of pathological CTG tracing: a randomized trial.
    Megalo A; Petignat P; Hohlfeld P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Sep; 116(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 15294364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The risk of placental abruption when using prostaglandins for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia: comparing misoprostol versus dinoprostone.
    Martinez de Tejada B; Martillotti G; Lapaire O; Hoesli I; Irion O
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Sep; 23(9):988-93. PubMed ID: 19941444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical baloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Tabowei TO; Oboro VO
    East Afr Med J; 2003 Feb; 80(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16167722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.
    Ande AB; Ezeanochie CM; Olagbuji NB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):967-71. PubMed ID: 22012248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
    Garry D; Figueroa R; Kalish RB; Catalano CJ; Maulik D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
    Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.