352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21782123)
61. Different biological and prognostic breast cancer populations identified by FDG-PET in sentinel node-positive patients: results and clinical implications after eight-years follow-up.
Agresti R; Crippa F; Sandri M; Martelli G; Tagliabue E; Alessi A; Pellitteri C; Maccauro M; Maugeri I; Barbara P; Rampa M; Moscaroli A; Ferraris C; Carcangiu ML; Bianchi G; Greco M; Bombardieri E
Breast; 2014 Aug; 23(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 24485802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Comprehensive axillary evaluation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients with ultrasonography and sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Khan A; Sabel MS; Nees A; Diehl KM; Cimmino VM; Kleer CG; Schott AF; Hayes DF; Chang AE; Newman LA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):697-704. PubMed ID: 16079956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Follow-up of B3 breast lesions without residual microcalcifications post vacuum-assisted biopsy, can contrast-enhanced digital mammography help?
Bicchierai G; Nori J; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Kaur Gill M; Cirone D; Miele V
Breast J; 2020 Feb; 26(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 31486197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. [40 years of progress in breast imaging].
De Maulmont C; Cherel P; Ouhioun O; Becette V; Stevens D; Plantet MM; Hagay C
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2000 Nov; 48(9):801-11. PubMed ID: 11141915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Screening mammography following autologous breast reconstruction: an unnecessary effort.
Freyvogel M; Padia S; Larson K; Dietz J; Grobmyer S; O'Rourke C; Valente S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3256-60. PubMed ID: 25059787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. A predictive tool to estimate the risk of axillary metastases in breast cancer patients with negative axillary ultrasound.
Meretoja TJ; Heikkilä PS; Mansfield AS; Cserni G; Ambrozay E; Boross G; Zgajnar J; Perhavec A; Gazic B; Arisio R; Tvedskov TF; Jensen MB; Leidenius MH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):2229-36. PubMed ID: 24664623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Echogenicity of breast cancer: is it of prognostic value?
Soon PS; Vallentine J; Palmer A; Magarey CJ; Schwartz P; Morris DL
Breast; 2004 Jun; 13(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 15177421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Controversies on the management of high-risk lesions at core biopsy from a radiology/pathology perspective.
Georgian-Smith D; Lawton TJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):999-1012. PubMed ID: 20868897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with operable breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Rebollo-Aguirre AC; Gallego-Peinado M; Menjón-Beltrán S; García-García J; Pastor-Pons E; Chamorro-Santos CE; Ramos-Font C; Salamanca-Ballesteros A; Llamas-Elvira JM; Olea-Serrano N
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2012; 31(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 21676504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.
Tunçbilek I; Ozdemir A; Gültekin S; Oğur T; Erman R; Yüce C
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Is there still a role for fine-needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer screening? Experience of the Verona Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening Program with real-time integrated radiopathologic activity (1999-2004).
Manfrin E; Mariotto R; Remo A; Reghellin D; Dalfior D; Falsirollo F; Bonetti F
Cancer; 2008 Apr; 114(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 18306357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. [Lobular cancer transformation of the female breast. Mammography diagnosis and clinical relevance].
Bochmann D; Bahnsen J; Löning T; Böcker W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Apr; 56(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 8682286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation.
Berg WA; Gilbreath PL
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 10644102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Tan LK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):901-10. PubMed ID: 12646427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer: predictors of accuracy and future implications.
Cools-Lartigue J; Sinclair A; Trabulsi N; Meguerditchian A; Mesurolle B; Fuhrer R; Meterissian S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):819-27. PubMed ID: 22972506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Simultaneous bilateral breast and high-resolution axillary MRI of patients with breast cancer: preliminary results.
Luciani A; Dao TH; Lapeyre M; Schwarzinger M; Debaecque C; Lantieri L; Revelon G; Bouanane M; Kobeiter H; Rahmouni A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):1059-67. PubMed ID: 15039188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Pre-operative factors indicating risk of multiple operations versus a single operation in women undergoing surgery for screen detected breast cancer.
O'Flynn EA; Currie RJ; Mohammed K; Allen SD; Michell MJ
Breast; 2013 Feb; 22(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 22789490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hata T; Takahashi H; Watanabe K; Takahashi M; Taguchi K; Itoh T; Todo S
J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Feb; 198(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 14759774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
