These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21783530)

  • 1. Evaluating the human response to chemicals: odor, irritation and non-sensory factors.
    Smeets MA; Dalton PH
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 May; 19(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 21783530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Odor, irritation and perception of health risk.
    Dalton P
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2002 Jun; 75(5):283-90. PubMed ID: 11981666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upper airway irritation, odor perception and health risk due to airborne chemicals.
    Dalton P
    Toxicol Lett; 2003 Apr; 140-141():239-48. PubMed ID: 12676471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of cognitive bias on the perceived odor, irritation and health symptoms from chemical exposure.
    Dalton P; Wysocki CJ; Brody MJ; Lawley HJ
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1997; 69(6):407-17. PubMed ID: 9215927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived odor, irritation, and health symptoms following short-term exposure to acetone.
    Dalton P; Wysocki CJ; Brody MJ; Lawley HJ
    Am J Ind Med; 1997 May; 31(5):558-69. PubMed ID: 9099358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intranasal chemoreception in patients with multiple chemical sensitivities: a double-blind investigation.
    Hummel T; Roscher S; Jaumann MP; Kobal G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Aug; 24(1 Pt 2):S79-86. PubMed ID: 8921561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A proposal for calculating occupational exposure limits for volatile organic compounds acting as sensory irritants on the basis of their physicochemical properties.
    Jakubowski M; Czerczak S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jul; 7(7):429-34. PubMed ID: 20473819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
    Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acetone odor and irritation thresholds obtained from acetone-exposed factory workers and from control (occupationally unexposed) subjects.
    Wysocki CJ; Dalton P; Brody MJ; Lawley HJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Oct; 58(10):704-12. PubMed ID: 9342830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Setting an indoor air exposure limit for formaldehyde: factors of concern.
    Arts JH; Muijser H; Kuper CF; Woutersen RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 18786592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysical methods in the study of olfaction and respiratory tract irritation.
    Dalton P
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 11767935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhaled formaldehyde: evaluation of sensory irritation in relation to carcinogenicity.
    Arts JH; Rennen MA; de Heer C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):144-60. PubMed ID: 16413643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensory irritation: risk assessment approaches.
    Nielsen GD; Wolkoff P; Alarie Y
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jun; 48(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 17241726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Formaldehyde and chemosensory irritation in humans: a controlled human exposure study.
    Lang I; Bruckner T; Triebig G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 50(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 17942205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A recommended occupational exposure limit for formaldehyde based on irritation.
    Paustenbach D; Alarie Y; Kulle T; Schachter N; Smith R; Swenberg J; Witschi H; Horowitz SB
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Feb; 50(3):217-63. PubMed ID: 9055874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Olfactory adaptation, threshold shift and recovery at low levels of exposure to methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK).
    Gagnon P; Mergler D; Lapare S
    Neurotoxicology; 1994; 15(3):637-42. PubMed ID: 7854600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple types of sensory neurons respond to irritating volatile organic compounds (VOCs): calcium fluorimetry of trigeminal ganglion neurons.
    Inoue T; Bryant BP
    Pain; 2005 Sep; 117(1-2):193-203. PubMed ID: 16043294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A strategy for the evaluation of sensory and pulmonary irritation due to chemical emissions from indoor sources.
    Muller WJ; Schaeffer VH
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1996 Sep; 46(9):808-12. PubMed ID: 8806216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Volatile organic compounds and formaldehyde as explaining factors for sensory irritation in office environments.
    Salonen H; Pasanen AL; Lappalainen S; Riuttala H; Tuomi T; Pasanen P; Back B; Reijula K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Apr; 6(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19184725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chemosensory function and response in idiopathic environmental intolerance.
    Dalton P; Hummel T
    Occup Med; 2000; 15(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 10903549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.