These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program. Tsertsvadze A; Maglione M; Chou R; Garritty C; Coleman C; Lux L; Bass E; Balshem H; Moher D J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1208-15. PubMed ID: 21684114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency. Honig PK Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20648031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making. Kranke P Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analyses of small numbers of trials often agree with longer-term results. Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20609563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantages of individual patient data analysis in systematic reviews. Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 20152706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated? French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews. Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A practical guide to meta-analysis. Chung KC; Burns PB; Kim HM J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Dec; 31(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 17145390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others. PLoS Medicine Editors PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e147. PubMed ID: 17388685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to read a nephrology systematic review. Palmer SC; Navaneethan SD; Strippoli GF Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Mar; 15(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20470273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Systematic review of the literature--an instrument to capture research results]. Malmivaara A Duodecim; 2002; 118(9):877-9. PubMed ID: 12238165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Meta-analysis of therapeutic trials. Risk of underestimating specific effects]. Norlin K Lakartidningen; 1999 May; 96(19):2332. PubMed ID: 10377677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews. Sutton AJ; Donegan S; Takwoingi Y; Garner P; Gamble C; Donald A J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18783919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]