127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21784519)
21. European regulations and their impact on tissue banking.
Tatarenko A
Cell Tissue Bank; 2006; 7(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 16821111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Coming soon to your clinic: high-quality ART.
van Empel IW; Nelen WL; Hermens RP; Kremer JA
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1242-5. PubMed ID: 18372252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The donation of gametes and embryos].
Merlet F
Rev Prat; 2014 Jan; 64(1):97-8. PubMed ID: 24649558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction.
Brenwald ML; Redeker K
Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [ New law on assisted reproduction: a necessary tinkering].
Kiefer B
Rev Med Suisse; 2015 May; 11(474):1096. PubMed ID: 26118243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Society's contribution to assisted reproductive technology abuse.
Kol S; Itskovitz-Eldor J
Hum Reprod; 2005 Aug; 20(8):2362. PubMed ID: 16024541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Storage, transport, and disposition of gametes and embryos: legal issues and practical considerations.
Rinehart LA
Fertil Steril; 2021 Feb; 115(2):274-281. PubMed ID: 33579521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of tissue discards after implementation of anti-HBc test in a tissue bank in Spain.
Villalba R; Fornés G; Eisman M; Gómez Villagrán JL
Cell Tissue Bank; 2007; 8(4):303-5. PubMed ID: 17447156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The birds, the bees, and the deep freeze: is there international consensus in the debate over assisted reproductive technologies?
Pitrolo EA
Houst J Int Law; 1996; 19(1):147-206. PubMed ID: 12666682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The art of donor gamete cryobanking: current considerations.
Centola GM
J Androl; 2002; 23(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 11868808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Rethinking progenitive conflict: why reproductive autonomy matters.
Priaulx N
Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(2):169-200. PubMed ID: 18413356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing risks--challenges posed by the European general product safety directive.
van Aken D
Inj Control Saf Promot; 2002 Sep; 9(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 12462167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assisted reproductive technology: both sides now.
Cheung AP
J Reprod Med; 2006 Apr; 51(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 16739266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.
Katz GA
Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Inequitable access to assisted reproductive technology for the low-income Brazilian population: a qualitative study.
Makuch MY; Simônia de Padua K; Petta CA; Duarte Osis MJ; Bahamondes L
Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2054-60. PubMed ID: 21613314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ethical dilemmas in reproductive medicine.
Paine SJ; Moore PK; Hill DL
Whittier Law Rev; 1996; 18(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16273701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsibilities.
Dondorp W; de Wert G
Hum Reprod; 2011 Jul; 26(7):1604-8. PubMed ID: 21502181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cryopreserved embryos: a response to "forced parenthood" and the role of intent.
Apel SB
Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):663-81. PubMed ID: 16610152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA.
Gleicher N; Weghofer A; Barad D
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1945-50. PubMed ID: 16690628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assisted reproductive technologies are an integrated part of national strategies addressing demographic and reproductive challenges.
Ziebe S; Devroey P;
Hum Reprod Update; 2008; 14(6):583-92. PubMed ID: 18786951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
