BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21784646)

  • 1. Retrieval analysis of modular total knee replacements: factors influencing backside surface damage.
    Brandt JM; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB; Medley JB
    Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):306-15. PubMed ID: 21784646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Second-generation locking mechanisms and ethylene oxide sterilization reduce tibial insert backside damage in total knee arthroplasty.
    Azzam MG; Roy ME; Whiteside LA
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 20541356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Backside damage corresponding to articular damage in retrieved tibial polyethylene inserts.
    Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():137-44. PubMed ID: 17242615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?
    Sisko ZW; Teeter MG; Lanting BA; Howard JL; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):2970-2980. PubMed ID: 28905208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polished trays reduce backside wear independent of post location in posterior-stabilized TKAs.
    Abdel MP; Gesell MW; Hoedt CW; Meyers KN; Wright TM; Haas SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 472(8):2477-82. PubMed ID: 24733449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post damage in contemporary posterior-stabilized tibial inserts: influence of implant design and clinical relevance.
    ; Medel FJ; Kurtz SM; Sharkey PF; Austin MS; Klein GR; Cohen AR; Patel H; Goldberg VM; Kraay MJ; Rimnac CM
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 21575793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral snap-fit locking mechanisms and smooth surface finish of tibial trays reduce backside wear in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Łapaj Ł; Mróz A; Kokoszka P; Markuszewski J; Wendland J; Helak-Łapaj C; Kruczyński J
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27781667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: mechanism and magnitude of material loss.
    Conditt MA; Thompson MT; Usrey MM; Ismaily SK; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Feb; 87(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 15687155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tibial interface wear in retrieved total knee components and correlations with modular insert motion.
    Rao AR; Engh GA; Collier MB; Lounici S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Oct; 84(10):1849-55. PubMed ID: 12377918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of backside wear from the analysis of 55 retrieved tibial inserts.
    Li S; Scuderi G; Furman BD; Bhattacharyya S; Schmieg JJ; Insall JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):75-82. PubMed ID: 12439241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polyethylene damage on the nonarticular surface of modular total knee prostheses.
    Cuckler JM; Lemons J; Tamarapalli JR; Beck P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):248-53. PubMed ID: 12771836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tibial tray debonding from the cement mantle is associated with deformation of the backside of polyethylene tibial inserts.
    Bhalekar RM; Nargol ME; Shyam N; Nargol AVF; Wells SR; Collier R; Pabbruwe M; Joyce TJ; Langton DJ
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Dec; 103-B(12):1791-1801. PubMed ID: 34474593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of wear in retrieved mobile and fixed bearing knee inserts.
    Engh GA; Zimmerman RL; Parks NL; Engh CA
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):28-32. PubMed ID: 19427754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of sterilization method on articular surface damage of retrieved cruciate-retaining tibial inserts.
    Greulich MT; Roy ME; Whiteside LA
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1085-93. PubMed ID: 22177798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo deterioration of tibial baseplate locking mechanisms in contemporary modular total knee components.
    Engh GA; Lounici S; Rao AR; Collier MB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1660-5. PubMed ID: 11701788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimal backside surface changes observed in retrieved acetabular liners.
    Akbari A; Roy ME; Whiteside LA; Katerberg BJ; Schnettgoecke DJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 20875939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface damage on open box posterior-stabilized polyethylene tibial inserts.
    Silva M; Kabbash CA; Tiberi JV; Park SH; Reilly DT; Mahoney OM; Schmalzried TP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):135-44. PubMed ID: 14646752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Material and surface factors influencing backside fretting wear in total knee replacement tibial components.
    Billi F; Sangiorgio SN; Aust S; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(7):1310-5. PubMed ID: 20172525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knee wear measured in retrievals: a polished tray reduces insert wear.
    Berry DJ; Currier JH; Mayor MB; Collier JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jul; 470(7):1860-8. PubMed ID: 22314963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Backside wear of modular ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tibial inserts.
    Conditt MA; Ismaily SK; Alexander JW; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 May; 86(5):1031-7. PubMed ID: 15118049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.