2771 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21784880)
1. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
Sterne JA; Sutton AJ; Ioannidis JP; Terrin N; Jones DR; Lau J; Carpenter J; Rücker G; Harbord RM; Schmid CH; Tetzlaff J; Deeks JJ; Peters J; Macaskill P; Schwarzer G; Duval S; Altman DG; Moher D; Higgins JP
BMJ; 2011 Jul; 343():d4002. PubMed ID: 21784880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.
Tang JL; Liu JL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
Egger M; Davey Smith G; Schneider M; Minder C
BMJ; 1997 Sep; 315(7109):629-34. PubMed ID: 9310563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.
Debray TPA; Moons KGM; Riley RD
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28975717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asymmetry in funnel plot.
Kaneda H
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 108(2):330-1. PubMed ID: 21712109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis.
Sterne JA; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):1046-55. PubMed ID: 11576817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey.
Ahmed I; Sutton AJ; Riley RD
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7762. PubMed ID: 22214758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.
Simmonds M
Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The case of the misleading funnel plot.
Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Terrin N; Schmid CH; Olkin I
BMJ; 2006 Sep; 333(7568):597-600. PubMed ID: 16974018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
Lin L
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.
Williamson PR; Gamble C
Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1547-61. PubMed ID: 15580591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The true meaning of DICE: don't ignore chance effects.
Clarke M
J R Soc Med; 2021 Dec; 114(12):575-577. PubMed ID: 34935558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.
Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Basic meta-analysis: conceptualization and computation.
Verhulst SJ; Colliver JA
J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Feb; 30(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 19218849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.
Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):882-93. PubMed ID: 16085191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
