177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21785059)
1. Feasibility of dose reduction using needle-structured image plates versus powder-structured plates for computed radiography of the knee.
Gruber M; Weber M; Homolka P; Nemec S; Fruehwald-Pallamar J; Uffmann M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W318-23. PubMed ID: 21785059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Needle image plates compared to conventional CR in chest radiography: is dose reduction possible?
Berger-Kulemann V; Pötter-Lang S; Gruber M; Berger R; Vonbank K; Weber M; Rabitsch W; Uffmann M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4156-60. PubMed ID: 21798682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging performance with different doses in skeletal radiography: comparison of a needle-structured and a conventional storage phosphor system with a flat-panel detector.
Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Körner M
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19001150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Assessment of clinical image quality in feline chest radiography with a needle-image plate (NIP) storage phosphor system--an approach to the evaluation of image quality in neonatal radiography].
Ludewig E; Hirsch W; Bosch B; Gäbler K; Sorge I; Succow D; Werrmann A; Gosch D
Rofo; 2010 Feb; 182(2):122-32. PubMed ID: 19859865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Depiction of low-contrast detail in digital radiography: comparison of powder- and needle-structured storage phosphor systems.
Körner M; Treitl M; Schaetzing R; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M; Wirth S
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jul; 41(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 16772853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
Gruber M; Uffmann M; Weber M; Prokop M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C
Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1544-50. PubMed ID: 16404566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose reduction in mammography by using imaging plate technology: A retrospective analysis.
Hittinger M; Mueck F; Wirth S; Hoberg B; Wanninger F; Wallner CP
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 129():109140. PubMed ID: 32593077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of standard-dose vs low-dose attenuation correction CT on image quality and positron emission tomographic attenuation correction.
Krishnasetty V; Bonab AA; Fischman AJ; Halpern EF; Aquino SL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Apr; 5(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 18359446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
Smet MH; Breysem L; Mussen E; Bosmans H; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
Berliner L; Buffa A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager.
Deschênes S; Charron G; Beaudoin G; Labelle H; Dubois J; Miron MC; Parent S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 20228703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation and potential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomography angiography.
Schabel C; Fenchel M; Schmidt B; Flohr TG; Wuerslin C; Thomas C; Korn A; Tsiflikas I; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M; Ketelsen D
Acad Radiol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 23099242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement.
De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
