447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21785298)
1. Finite element modeling of kinematic and load transmission alterations due to cervical intervertebral disc replacement.
Womack W; Leahy PD; Patel VV; Puttlitz CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):E1126-33. PubMed ID: 21785298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cartilage thickness distribution affects computational model predictions of cervical spine facet contact parameters.
Womack W; Ayturk UM; Puttlitz CM
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jan; 133(1):011009. PubMed ID: 21186899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The facet joint loading profile of a cervical intervertebral disc replacement incorporating a novel saddle-shaped articulation.
Stieber JR; Quirno M; Kang M; Valdevit A; Errico TJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Oct; 24(7):432-6. PubMed ID: 21336178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 22652989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis.
Le Huec JC; Lafage V; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Josse L; Liu M; Skalli W
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 20068471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjacent level effects of bi level disc replacement, bi level fusion and disc replacement plus fusion in cervical spine--a finite element based study.
Faizan A; Goel VK; Biyani A; Garfin SR; Bono CM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 22019300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):939-47. PubMed ID: 20375779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight versus lordotic fusion.
Martin S; Ghanayem AJ; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):1359-66. PubMed ID: 21629170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ProDisc cervical arthroplasty does not alter facet joint contact pressure during lateral bending or axial torsion.
Jaumard NV; Bauman JA; Guarino BB; Gokhale AJ; Lipschutz DE; Weisshaar CL; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(2):E84-93. PubMed ID: 23132537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
