175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21786006)
1. Differences in structural geometrical outcomes at the neck of the proximal femur using two-dimensional DXA-derived projection (APEX) and three-dimensional QCT-derived (BIT QCT) techniques.
Khoo BC; Brown K; Zhu K; Pollock M; Wilson KE; Price RI; Prince RL
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1393-8. PubMed ID: 21786006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of the assessment of 4 determinants of structural geometry on QCT- and DXA-derived hip structural analysis measurements in elderly women.
Khoo BC; Brown K; Zhu K; Price RI; Prince RL
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 23578719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vivo comparison of hip structure analysis (HSA) with measurements obtained by QCT.
Ramamurthi K; Ahmad O; Engelke K; Taylor RH; Zhu K; Gustafsson S; Prince RL; Wilson KE
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Feb; 23(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 21394495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores.
Khoo BC; Brown K; Cann C; Zhu K; Henzell S; Low V; Gustafsson S; Price RI; Prince RL
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1539-45. PubMed ID: 19107384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of DXA and CT based methods for estimating the strength of the femoral neck in post-menopausal women.
Danielson ME; Beck TJ; Karlamangla AS; Greendale GA; Atkinson EJ; Lian Y; Khaled AS; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl D; Ruppert K; Greenspan S; Vuga M; Cauley JA
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Apr; 24(4):1379-88. PubMed ID: 22810918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structural Parameters of the Proximal Femur by 3-Dimensional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Software: Comparison With Quantitative Computed Tomography.
Clotet J; Martelli Y; Di Gregorio S; Del Río Barquero LM; Humbert L
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):550-562. PubMed ID: 28624339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of femoral neck geometric parameters between Chinese and Japanese females.
Li L; Wu X; Zhang H; Liao E; Dai R; Wu X
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Mar; 47(3):319-327. PubMed ID: 35545324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of eldecalcitol, an active vitamin D analog, on hip structure and biomechanical properties: 3D assessment by clinical CT.
Ito M; Nakamura T; Fukunaga M; Shiraki M; Matsumoto T
Bone; 2011 Sep; 49(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 21605716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.
Cheng XG; Lowet G; Boonen S; Nicholson PH; Brys P; Nijs J; Dequeker J
Bone; 1997 Mar; 20(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 9071471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip.
Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; Li J; Meta MD; Scillitani A; Lang TF
Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 16875335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.
Bousson V; Le Bras A; Roqueplan F; Kang Y; Mitton D; Kolta S; Bergot C; Skalli W; Vicaut E; Kalender W; Engelke K; Laredo JD
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 16547689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.
Szulc P; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Dargent-Molina P; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Feb; 17(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 15983728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of 3D Geometric Measures Derived From Quantitative Computed Tomography With Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men.
Borggrefe J; de Buhr T; Shrestha S; Marshall LM; Orwoll E; Peters K; Black DM; Glüer CC;
J Bone Miner Res; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1550-8. PubMed ID: 26916713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of DXA hip structural analysis with volumetric QCT.
Prevrhal S; Shepherd JA; Faulkner KG; Gaither KW; Black DM; Lang TF
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 18280192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of femur stiffness measured from DXA and QCT for assessment of hip fracture risk.
Luo Y; Yang H
J Bone Miner Metab; 2019 Mar; 37(2):342-350. PubMed ID: 29671044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical thickness in the intertrochanteric region may be relevant to hip fracture type.
Zhuang H; Li Y; Lin J; Cai D; Cai S; Yan L; Yao X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jul; 18(1):305. PubMed ID: 28720137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of peripheral quantitative computed tomography forearm bone density versus DXA in rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls.
Juhász B; Gulyás K; Horváth Á; Pethő Z; Bhattoa HP; Váncsa A; Szekanecz É; Horváth C; Kocsis J; Horváth Z; Hodosi K; Szántó S; Szűcs G; Szekanecz Z
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Apr; 28(4):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 27942777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials.
Khoo BC; Beck TJ; Qiao QH; Parakh P; Semanick L; Prince RL; Singer KP; Price RI
Bone; 2005 Jul; 37(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 15869917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proximal femur geometry assessed by hip structural analysis in hip fracture in women.
Iolascon G; Moretti A; Cannaviello G; Resmini G; Gimigliano F
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2015 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S17-21. PubMed ID: 26178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?
Museyko O; Bousson V; Adams J; Laredo J-; Engelke K
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 26415934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
