209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21786286)
21. Nonparametric empirical Bayes method for comparison of treatment effects with application to stress urinary incontinence data.
Liu C; Shen W; Xie J
Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 17311241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bayesian nonparametric centered random effects models with variable selection.
Yang M
Biom J; 2013 Mar; 55(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 23322356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nonparametric bayesian estimation of positive false discovery rates.
Tang Y; Ghosal S; Roy A
Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1126-34. PubMed ID: 17501943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bayesian nonparametric estimation of ROC surface under verification bias.
Zhu R; Ghosal S
Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3361-3377. PubMed ID: 31049998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Bayesian chi-squared goodness-of-fit test for censored data models.
Cao J; Moosman A; Johnson VE
Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):426-34. PubMed ID: 19645701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Dirichlet process mixture model for brain MRI tissue classification.
Ferreira da Silva AR
Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 17258932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nonparametric Bayesian methods for benchmark dose estimation.
Guha N; Roy A; Kopylev L; Fox J; Spassova M; White P
Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1608-19. PubMed ID: 23339666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Testing for interaction in two-way random and mixed effects models: the fully nonparametric approach.
Gaugler T; Akritas MG
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1314-20. PubMed ID: 21401567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bayesian estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for a diagnostic test with a limit of detection in the absence of a gold standard.
Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Utts JM; Gardner IA
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2090-106. PubMed ID: 20603894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bayesian analysis of crossclassified spatial data with autocorrelation.
Sun L; Clayton MK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 17680834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Semiparametric Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with fixed covariates.
Lee SY; Lu B; Song XY
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2341-60. PubMed ID: 18008378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of two populations of curves with an application in neuronal data analysis.
Behseta S; Chenouri S
Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(12):1441-54. PubMed ID: 21341297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A semiparametric Bayesian approach for structural equation models.
Song XY; Pan JH; Kwok T; Vandenput L; Ohlsson C; Leung PC
Biom J; 2010 Jun; 52(3):314-32. PubMed ID: 20533410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Parametric and nonparametric FDR estimation revisited.
Wu B; Guan Z; Zhao H
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):735-44. PubMed ID: 16984315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.
Cai T; Cheng S
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 18056687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A statistical method was used for the meta-analysis of tests for latent TB in the absence of a gold standard, combining random-effect and latent-class methods to estimate test accuracy.
Sadatsafavi M; Shahidi N; Marra F; FitzGerald MJ; Elwood KR; Guo N; Marra CA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 19692208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
