These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21786904)

  • 21. Hearing aid users benefit from induction loop when using digital cellular phones.
    Sorri M; Piiparinen P; Huttunen K; Haho M; Tobey E; Thibodeau L; Buckley K
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 12677109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of multimicrophone noise reduction systems on sound source localization by users of binaural hearing aids.
    Van den Bogaert T; Doclo S; Wouters J; Moonen M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):484-97. PubMed ID: 18646992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Noise reduction in hearing aids: a review.
    Levitt H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 11322463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Ways of using digital signal processing for expanding the potentials of hearing aids].
    Babkina LN; Molchanov AP
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1998; (4):18-21. PubMed ID: 9752090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Planar nearfield acoustical holography in moving fluid medium at subsonic and uniform velocity.
    Kwon HS; Niu Y; Kim YJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1823-32. PubMed ID: 20968355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A 1.2-V 165-μW 0.29-mm2 multibit Sigma-Delta ADC for hearing aids using nonlinear DACs and with over 91 dB dynamic-range.
    Custodio JR; Goes J; Paulino N; Oliveira JP; Bruun E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2013 Jun; 7(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 23853337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Classification of steady state gain reduction produced by amplitude modulation based noise reduction in digital hearing aids.
    Hoetink AE; Körössy L; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):444-55. PubMed ID: 19925331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Beamforming with a circular microphone array for localization of environmental noise sources.
    Tiana-Roig E; Jacobsen F; Grande EF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3535-42. PubMed ID: 21218886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The hearing aid feedback path: mathematical simulations and experimental verification.
    Egolf DP; Howell HC; Weaver KA; Barker DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Nov; 78(5):1578-87. PubMed ID: 4067073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Feedback path variability modeling for robust hearing aids.
    Rafaely B; Roccasalva-Firenze M; Payne E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2665-73. PubMed ID: 10830388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Design and analysis of high-capacity associative memories based on a class of discrete-time recurrent neural networks.
    Zeng Z; Wang J
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Dec; 38(6):1525-36. PubMed ID: 19022724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hearing aids using binaural processing principles.
    Van Compernolle D
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():76-84. PubMed ID: 2356740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Noise reduction in binaural hearing aids: analyzing the benefit over monaural systems.
    Srinivasan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):EL353-9. PubMed ID: 19206693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Active control of transmission loss with smart foams.
    Kundu A; Berry A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):726-40. PubMed ID: 21361432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing aids: a review of what's new.
    Kim HH; Barrs DM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Jun; 134(6):1043-50. PubMed ID: 16730553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Room reverberation effects in hearing aid feedback cancellation.
    Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):367-78. PubMed ID: 11206165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The problem of feedback in hearing aids.
    Kates JM
    J Commun Disord; 1991 Jun; 24(3):223-35. PubMed ID: 1939727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: polar characteristics of behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Chung K; Mongeau L; McKibben N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2243-59. PubMed ID: 19354400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.