149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21786910)
1. The mutual roles of temporal glimpsing and vocal characteristics in cocktail-party listening.
Vestergaard MD; Fyson NR; Patterson RD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):429-39. PubMed ID: 21786910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adding irrelevant information to the content prime reduces the prime-induced unmasking effect on speech recognition.
Wu M; Li H; Gao Y; Lei M; Teng X; Wu X; Li L
Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):136-43. PubMed ID: 22101022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human phoneme recognition depending on speech-intrinsic variability.
Meyer BT; Jürgens T; Wesker T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3126-41. PubMed ID: 21110608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.
Wu C; Cao S; Wu X; Li L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL281-5. PubMed ID: 23556692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The interaction of vocal characteristics and audibility in the recognition of concurrent syllables.
Vestergaard MD; Fyson NR; Patterson RD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1114-24. PubMed ID: 19206886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.
Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1152-64. PubMed ID: 22894234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise.
Woods DL; Yund EW; Herron TJ; Ua Cruadhlaoich MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1609-23. PubMed ID: 20329860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception in noise: exploring the effect of linguistic context in children with and without auditory processing disorder.
Lagacé J; Jutras B; Giguère C; Gagné JP
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):385-95. PubMed ID: 21599614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sources of variability in consonant perception of normal-hearing listeners.
Zaar J; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1253-67. PubMed ID: 26428764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
