149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21786910)
41. Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli.
Lister J; Tarver K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 15157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Speech recognition in noise with active and passive hearing protectors: a comparative study.
Bockstael A; De Coensel B; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Bart V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3702-15. PubMed ID: 21682395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
Gnansia D; Pressnitzer D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
Francis AL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Speaker normalization using cortical strip maps: a neural model for steady-state vowel categorization.
Ames H; Grossberg S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3918-36. PubMed ID: 19206817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Visual cues and listening effort: individual variability.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1416-30. PubMed ID: 21498576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Fusion of spatially separated vowel formant cues.
Takanen M; Raitio T; Santala O; Alku P; Pulkki V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4508. PubMed ID: 25669261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Factors limiting vocal-tract length discrimination in cochlear implant simulations.
Gaudrain E; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 25786943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention.
Koelewijn T; de Kluiver H; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():81-90. PubMed ID: 25732724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Masking release effects of a standard and a regional linguistic variety.
Brouwer S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL237. PubMed ID: 28863622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The role of pitch and timing cues in the perception of phrasal grouping in Seoul Korean.
Jeon HS; Nolan F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3039-49. PubMed ID: 23654407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Gaps-in-noise detection and gender identification from noise-vocoded vowel segments: Comparing performance of active musicians to non-musicians.
Donai JJ; Jennings MB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL128. PubMed ID: 27250197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Analysis of Spanish consonant recognition in 8-talker babble.
Moreno-Torres I; Otero P; Luna-Ramírez S; Garayzábal Heinze E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3079. PubMed ID: 28599525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of the relationship between target and masker sex on infants' recognition of speech.
Newman RS; Morini G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL164. PubMed ID: 28253666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Training listeners to report the acoustic correlate of formant-frequency scaling using synthetic voices.
Barreda S; Nearey TM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1065-77. PubMed ID: 23363122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Glimpsing speech in temporally and spectro-temporally modulated noise.
Fogerty D; Carter BL; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3047. PubMed ID: 29857753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Spectro-temporal glimpsing of speech in noise: Regularity and coherence of masking patterns reduces uncertainty and increases intelligibility.
Fogerty D; Sevich VA; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1552. PubMed ID: 33003879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Vowel normalization and the perception of speaker changes: an exploration of the contextual tuning hypothesis.
Barreda S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3453-64. PubMed ID: 23145625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Efficiency in glimpsing vowel sequences in fluctuating makers: Effects of temporal fine structure and temporal regularity.
Shen Y; Pearson DV
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2518. PubMed ID: 31046353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.
Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1562-73. PubMed ID: 16583901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
