These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21786910)

  • 61. A role for amplitude modulation phase relationships in speech rhythm perception.
    Leong V; Stone MA; Turner RE; Goswami U
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):366-81. PubMed ID: 24993221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Efficiency in glimpsing vowel sequences in fluctuating makers: Effects of temporal fine structure and temporal regularity.
    Shen Y; Pearson DV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2518. PubMed ID: 31046353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location.
    Drennan WR; Gatehouse S; Lever C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2178-89. PubMed ID: 14587615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.
    McCloy DR; Lau BK; Larson E; Pratt KAI; Lee AKC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2440. PubMed ID: 28464660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. School-age children's environmental object identification in natural auditory scenes: effects of masking and contextual congruence.
    Krishnan S; Leech R; Aydelott J; Dick F
    Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 300():46-55. PubMed ID: 23518401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Identification of children's gender and age by listeners.
    Amir O; Engel M; Shabtai E; Amir N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 21840167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Discrimination and streaming of speech sounds based on differences in interaural and spectral cues.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1674. PubMed ID: 28964066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Divided attention disrupts perceptual encoding during speech recognition.
    Mattys SL; Palmer SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1464-72. PubMed ID: 25786957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Negative emotions in the target speaker's voice enhance speech recognition under "cocktail-party" environments.
    Lu L; Ding Y; Xue C; Li L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):247-259. PubMed ID: 33078380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Modeling of speech localization in a multi-talker mixture using periodicity and energy-based auditory features.
    Josupeit A; Kopčo N; Hohmann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2911. PubMed ID: 27250183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The role of glimpses with different energy in speech-in-noise recognition.
    Tang Y
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Feb; 2(2):025201. PubMed ID: 36154263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. An examination of error reductions in consonant recognition when vision and hearing are combined.
    Berryman L; Dancer J; Burl N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):558. PubMed ID: 8724928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Stream segregation of concurrent speech and the verbal transformation effect: Influence of fundamental frequency and lateralization cues.
    Stachurski M; Summers RJ; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():16-27. PubMed ID: 28843209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jan; 69(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 17515218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Co-articulatory Cues for Communication: An Investigation of Five Environments.
    Pycha A
    Lang Speech; 2016 Sep; 59(Pt 3):364-86. PubMed ID: 29924531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Automatic speech recognition in cocktail-party situations: a specific training for separated speech.
    Marti A; Cobos M; Lopez JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1529-35. PubMed ID: 22352522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Better-ear rating based on glimpsing.
    Schoenmaker E; Sutojo S; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1466. PubMed ID: 28964056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Two effects of perceived speaker similarity in resolving the cocktail party situation - ERPs and functional connectivity.
    Kovács P; Szalárdy O; Winkler I; Tóth B
    Biol Psychol; 2023 Sep; 182():108651. PubMed ID: 37517603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effects of voicing in the recognition of concurrent syllables.
    Vestergaard MD; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):2860-3. PubMed ID: 20000898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Unattended speech processing: effect of vocal-tract length.
    Rivenez M; Darwin CJ; Bourgeon L; Guillaume A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):EL90-5. PubMed ID: 17348552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.