167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21786914)
1. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
Fogerty D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.
Fogerty D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):977-88. PubMed ID: 21361454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.
Fogerty D; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1679-89. PubMed ID: 22978896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
Apoux F; Yoho SE; Youngdahl CL; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancement of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms: role of amplitude envelope and temporal fine structure.
Srinivasan NK; Zahorik P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL239-45. PubMed ID: 24907828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
Ueda K; Araki T; Nakajima Y
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.
Mackersie CL; Dewey J; Guthrie LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):1006-19. PubMed ID: 21877813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
Başkent D; Chatterjee M
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.
Shofner WP; Campbell J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL398-404. PubMed ID: 23145701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
Mehraei G; Gallun FJ; Leek MR; Bernstein JG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.
Qi B; Mao Y; Liu J; Liu B; Xu L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3022. PubMed ID: 28599529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
Jin SH; Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
