153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21787308)
1. A sampling-based method for ranking protein structural models by integrating multiple scores and features.
Shi X; Zhang J; He Z; Shang Y; Xu D
Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2011 Sep; 12(6):540-8. PubMed ID: 21787308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.
Benkert P; Schwede T; Tosatto SC
BMC Struct Biol; 2009 May; 9():35. PubMed ID: 19457232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13.
Hou J; Wu T; Cao R; Cheng J
Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1165-1178. PubMed ID: 30985027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SELECTpro: effective protein model selection using a structure-based energy function resistant to BLUNDERs.
Randall A; Baldi P
BMC Struct Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():52. PubMed ID: 19055744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protein structural model selection by combining consensus and single scoring methods.
He Z; Alazmi M; Zhang J; Xu D
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74006. PubMed ID: 24023923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protein contact prediction by integrating deep multiple sequence alignments, coevolution and machine learning.
Adhikari B; Hou J; Cheng J
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):84-96. PubMed ID: 29047157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A high-accuracy protein structural class prediction algorithm using predicted secondary structural information.
Liu T; Jia C
J Theor Biol; 2010 Dec; 267(3):272-5. PubMed ID: 20831876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines.
Wang Z; Tegge AN; Cheng J
Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):638-47. PubMed ID: 19004001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving predicted protein loop structure ranking using a Pareto-optimality consensus method.
Li Y; Rata I; Chiu SW; Jakobsson E
BMC Struct Biol; 2010 Jul; 10():22. PubMed ID: 20642859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SMOQ: a tool for predicting the absolute residue-specific quality of a single protein model with support vector machines.
Cao R; Wang Z; Wang Y; Cheng J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():120. PubMed ID: 24776231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Massive integration of diverse protein quality assessment methods to improve template based modeling in CASP11.
Cao R; Bhattacharya D; Adhikari B; Li J; Cheng J
Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):247-59. PubMed ID: 26369671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of beta-turns at over 80% accuracy based on an ensemble of predicted secondary structures and multiple alignments.
Zheng C; Kurgan L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():430. PubMed ID: 18847492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of deep learning methods for blind protein contact prediction in CASP12.
Wang S; Sun S; Xu J
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):67-77. PubMed ID: 28845538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On-line hierarchy of general linear models for selecting and ranking the best predicted protein structures.
Girgis HZ; Corso JJ; Fischer D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():4949-53. PubMed ID: 19963875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assessment of protein model-structures based on structural and functional similarities.
Konopka BM; Nebel JC; Kotulska M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():242. PubMed ID: 22998498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MUFOLD-WQA: A new selective consensus method for quality assessment in protein structure prediction.
Wang Q; Vantasin K; Xu D; Shang Y
Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):185-95. PubMed ID: 21997748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust.
Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schwede T
Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():173-80. PubMed ID: 19705484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold-recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of models.
Koliński A; Bujnicki JM
Proteins; 2005; 61 Suppl 7():84-90. PubMed ID: 16187348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FunFOLDQA: a quality assessment tool for protein-ligand binding site residue predictions.
Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38219. PubMed ID: 22666491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
