These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21787479)

  • 1. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris.
    Pai S; Thomas MS
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):741; author reply 741-3. PubMed ID: 21787479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris.
    Dai L; Khechen K; Khan S; Gillen B; Loushine BA; Wimmer CE; Gutmann JL; Pashley D; Tay FR
    J Endod; 2011 Jan; 37(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 21146083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Smear Layer Removal Ability of QMix with Different Activation Techniques.
    Arslan D; Guneser MB; Dincer AN; Kustarci A; Er K; Siso SH
    J Endod; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1279-85. PubMed ID: 27287613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of 3D conforming nickel titanium rotary instruments in eliminating canal wall bacteria from oval-shaped root canals.
    Bortoluzzi EA; Carlon D; Meghil MM; El-Awady AR; Niu L; Bergeron BE; Susin L; Cutler CW; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 25593001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of QMix irrigant on bond strength of glass fibre posts to root dentine.
    Elnaghy AM
    Int Endod J; 2014 Mar; 47(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 23829648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of a novel irrigant, QMiX.
    Stojicic S; Shen Y; Qian W; Johnson B; Haapasalo M
    Int Endod J; 2012 Apr; 45(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 23134158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of flowable gel-type EDTA at removing the smear layer and inorganic debris under manual dynamic activation.
    Kim HJ; Park SJ; Park SH; Hwang YC; Yu MK; Min KS
    J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):910-4. PubMed ID: 23791262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Hariharan VS; Nandlal B; Srilatha KT
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 21273715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of smear layer against disinfection protocols on Enterococcus faecalis-infected dentin.
    Wang Z; Shen Y; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1395-400. PubMed ID: 24139261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Research progress on QMix properties in root canal irrigation].
    Jiayi W; Ruijie H
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 35(5):543-548. PubMed ID: 29188654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Endodontics in motion: new concepts, materials and techniques 3. The role of irrigants during root canal treatment].
    van der Sluis LW
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2015 Oct; 122(10):533-8. PubMed ID: 26465016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Rödig T; Döllmann S; Konietschke F; Drebenstedt S; Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1983-7. PubMed ID: 21092817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QMix® irrigant reduces lipopolysacharide (LPS) levels in an in vitro model.
    Gründling GL; Melo TA; Montagner F; Scarparo RK; Vier-Pelisser FV
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 26398517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of EDTA solution as an endodontic irrigant.
    Yoshida T; Shibata T; Shinohara T; Gomyo S; Sekine I
    J Endod; 1995 Dec; 21(12):592-3. PubMed ID: 8596078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduction of hard-tissue debris accumulation during rotary root canal instrumentation by etidronic acid in a sodium hypochlorite irrigant.
    Paqué F; Rechenberg DK; Zehnder M
    J Endod; 2012 May; 38(5):692-5. PubMed ID: 22515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smear layer removal by EGTA.
    Calt S; Serper A
    J Endod; 2000 Aug; 26(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 11199779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
    Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.