1512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21787484)
1. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
Azar MR; Mokhtare M
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Torsional behaviour of rotary NiTi ProTaper Universal instruments after multiple clinical use.
Vieira EP; Nakagawa RK; Buono VT; Bahia MG
Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):947-53. PubMed ID: 19751294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the separation incidence of mtwo files used with preflaring: prospective clinical study.
Ehrhardt IC; Zuolo ML; Cunha RS; De Martin AS; Kherlakian D; Carvalho MC; Bueno CE
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1078-81. PubMed ID: 22794209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture.
Kim HC; Lee MH; Yum J; Versluis A; Lee CJ; Kim BM
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1195-9. PubMed ID: 20630298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the centreing ability of the ProTaper Universal rotary system in curved roots in comparison to Nitiflex files.
Aguiar CM; de Andrade Mendes D; Câmara AC; de Figueiredo JA
Aust Endod J; 2009 Dec; 35(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 19961458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file.
Yoldas O; Yilmaz S; Atakan G; Kuden C; Kasan Z
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 22244643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment.
Di Fiore PM; Genov KA; Komaroff E; Li Y; Lin L
Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 16916359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Success of ultrasonic technique in removing fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals and its effect on the required force for root fracture.
Shahabinejad H; Ghassemi A; Pishbin L; Shahravan A
J Endod; 2013 Jun; 39(6):824-8. PubMed ID: 23683286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
