These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21788130)

  • 1. Determinants of successful implementation of population-based cancer screening programmes.
    Lynge E; Törnberg S; von Karsa L; Segnan N; van Delden JJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Mar; 48(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 21788130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cancer screening policies and coverage in Europe.
    Anttila A; von Karsa L; Aasmaa A; Fender M; Patnick J; Rebolj M; Nicula F; Vass L; Valerianova Z; Voti L; Sauvaget C; Ronco G
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Oct; 45(15):2649-58. PubMed ID: 19699081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
    Hristova L; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Isolated colorectal cancer screening or integrated cancer prevention? A provocative suggestion!
    Stockbrugger R
    Dig Dis; 2012; 30(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 22722558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of socio-economic variables in cancer screening participation: a comparison between population-based and opportunistic screening in the EU-15.
    Walsh B; Silles M; O'Neill C
    Health Policy; 2011 Aug; 101(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 21420755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colorectal cancer screening in an expanding panorama of screening programmes.
    Hoff G
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 20833354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Principles of evidence assessment and methods for reaching recommendations.
    Minozzi S; Armaroli P; Segnan N
    Endoscopy; 2012 Sep; 44 Suppl 3():SE9-14. PubMed ID: 23012125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National tuberculosis programme review: experience over the period 1990-95.
    Pio A; Luelmo F; Kumaresan J; Spinaci S
    Bull World Health Organ; 1997; 75(6):569-81. PubMed ID: 9509630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementing colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: addressing cancer health disparities through a regional cancer collaborative.
    Taplin SH; Haggstrom D; Jacobs T; Determan A; Granger J; Montalvo W; Snyder WM; Lockhart S; Calvo A
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S74-83. PubMed ID: 18725837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population-based breast cancer screening: policy advice for a New Zealand screening programme. Breast Cancer Screening Policy Advisory Group.
    N Z Med J; 1998 Apr; 111(1064):138-42. PubMed ID: 9612474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of primary care in colorectal cancer screening: experience from Czech Republic.
    Seifert B; Zavoral M; Fric P; Bencko V
    Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 18190246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards better implementation of cancer screening in Europe through improved monitoring and evaluation and greater engagement of cancer registries.
    Anttila A; Lönnberg S; Ponti A; Suonio E; Villain P; Coebergh JW; von Karsa L
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jan; 51(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 25483785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Annotations of colorectal lesions.
    Vieth M; Quirke P; Lambert R; von Karsa L; Risio M;
    Endoscopy; 2012 Sep; 44 Suppl 3():SE131-9. PubMed ID: 23012116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversy.
    Gomella LG; Liu XS; Trabulsi EJ; Kelly WK; Myers R; Showalter T; Dicker A; Wender R
    Can J Urol; 2011 Oct; 18(5):5875-83. PubMed ID: 22018148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges in starting organised screening programmes for cervical cancer in the new member states of the European Union.
    Nicula FA; Anttila A; Neamtiu L; Zakelj MP; Tachezy R; Chil A; Grce M; Kesić V
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Oct; 45(15):2679-84. PubMed ID: 19699083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer screening: evidence and practice in Europe 2008.
    Hakama M; Coleman MP; Alexe DM; Auvinen A
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jul; 44(10):1404-13. PubMed ID: 18343653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Round one of the Adelaide and Meath Hospital/Trinity College Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme: programme report and analysis based on established international key performance indices.
    McNamara D; Qasim A; Lee N; Condon C; O'Morain C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 180(2):549-52. PubMed ID: 21264524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efforts in fighting against cancer in Croatia have to be focused on the primary health care.
    Trtica LM; Strnad M; Gmajnić R; Ebling B; Ebling Z; Marković I; Samija M
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Sep; 32(3):709-24. PubMed ID: 18982742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cancer screening: are the 1989 recommendations still valid? National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.
    Parboosingh EJ; Anderson G; Clarke EA; Inhaber S; Kaegi E; Mills C; Mao Y; Root L; Stuart G; Stachenko S
    CMAJ; 1996 Jun; 154(12):1847-53. PubMed ID: 8653644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Colorectal cancer screening programme in France, role of the National Institute of Cancer].
    Viguier J; Nathan Mle Q
    Med Sci (Paris); 2009 Mar; 25 Spec No 1():45-52. PubMed ID: 19361412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.