418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21788905)
1. Near-infrared imaging of the breast using omocianine as a fluorescent dye: results of a placebo-controlled, clinical, multicenter trial.
Poellinger A; Persigehl T; Mahler M; Bahner M; Ponder SL; Diekmann F; Bremer C; Moesta T
Invest Radiol; 2011 Nov; 46(11):697-704. PubMed ID: 21788905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer: early- and late-fluorescence near-infrared imaging with indocyanine green--a preliminary study.
Poellinger A; Burock S; Grosenick D; Hagen A; Lüdemann L; Diekmann F; Engelken F; Macdonald R; Rinneberg H; Schlag PM
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 21177396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Near-infrared laser computed tomography of the breast first clinical experience.
Poellinger A; Martin JC; Ponder SL; Freund T; Hamm B; Bick U; Diekmann F
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1545-53. PubMed ID: 19000871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of a fully automatic lesion detection system for breast DCE-MRI.
Vignati A; Giannini V; De Luca M; Morra L; Persano D; Carbonaro LA; Bertotto I; Martincich L; Regge D; Bert A; Sardanelli F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1341-51. PubMed ID: 21965159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phase-contrast diffuse optical tomography pilot results in the breast.
Liang X; Zhang Q; Li C; Grobmyer SR; Fajardo LL; Jiang H
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 18572121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic optical breast imaging: a novel technique to detect and characterize tumor vessels.
Fournier LS; Vanel D; Athanasiou A; Gatzemeier W; Masuykov IV; Padhani AR; Dromain C; Galetti K; Sigal R; Costa A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18829193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Near-infrared imaging of breast cancer using optical contrast agents.
Poellinger A
J Biophotonics; 2012 Nov; 5(11-12):815-26. PubMed ID: 23132668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fluorescence-enhanced three-dimensional lifetime imaging: a phantom study.
Roy R; Godavarty A; Sevick-Muraca EM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4155-70. PubMed ID: 17664600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period].
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Weigel S; Nüssle-Kügele K; Sittek H; Arand B; Morakkabati N; Leutner C; Tombach B; Nordhoff D; Perlet C; Rieber A; Heindel W; Brambs HJ; Schild H
Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 15902631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast MR segmentation and lesion detection with cellular neural networks and 3D template matching.
Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Osman O; Uçan ON; Tunaci M; Dursun M
Comput Biol Med; 2008 Jan; 38(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 17854795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of diffuse optical tomography, ultrasound elastography and mammography in the diagnosis of breast tumors.
Zhang H; Qin D; Yang Z; Wang K; Sun F; Li B; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24210860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dynamic infrared imaging-based diagnostic process for breast cancer.
Joro R; Lääperi AL; Dastidar P; Järvenpää R; Kuukasjärvi T; Toivonen T; Saaristo R; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):860-9. PubMed ID: 19636984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
