These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21789288)

  • 1. AUSOM: a 3D placement guide for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Al-Suleiman M; Shehadah M
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 21789288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple three-dimensional stent for proper placement of mini-implant.
    Felicita AS
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14(1):45. PubMed ID: 24326158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
    Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure?
    Kim SH; Kang SM; Choi YS; Kook YA; Chung KR; Huang JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 20816295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of orthodontic mini-implants placed at the anterior palate by tooth-borne or gingiva-borne guide support: a cadaveric study.
    Möhlhenrich SC; Brandt M; Kniha K; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Modabber A; Wolf M; Peters F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4425-4431. PubMed ID: 30982181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
    Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!
    Romano FL; Consolaro A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25741821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival of splinted mini-implants after contamination with stainless steel.
    Jofré J; Conrady Y; Carrasco C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 20369095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of miniscrew implant placement with a 3-dimensional surgical guide.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1245-52. PubMed ID: 18486791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis.
    Brown RN; Sexton BE; Gabriel Chu TM; Katona TR; Stewart KT; Kyung HM; Liu SS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 24703288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-dimensional radiographic and clinical references of the tooth crown for orthodontic mini-implant insertion: a guide-free technique.
    Barros SE; Janson G; Chiqueto K; Garib DG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):e8-16. PubMed ID: 20869273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pan CY; Chou ST; Tseng YC; Yang YH; Wu CY; Lan TH; Liu PH; Chang HP
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 28(12):673-8. PubMed ID: 23217360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.
    Saxena R; Kumar PS; Upadhyay M; Naik V
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 21491000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical application of a stereolithographic surgical guide for simple positioning of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Kim SH; Kang JM; Choi B; Nelson G
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 19146019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim SH; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S82-9. PubMed ID: 17448391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate pre-surgical determination for self-drilling miniscrew implant placement using surgical guides and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Miyazawa K; Kawaguchi M; Tabuchi M; Goto S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 20413451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preorthodontic implant placement in the planned postorthodontic position: a simplified technique and clinical report.
    Solow RA
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e193-203. PubMed ID: 22782051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.