These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
864 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21790224)
1. Preoperative prediction of neurovascular bundle involvement of localized prostate cancer by combined T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging, number of positive biopsy cores, and Gleason score. Naiki T; Okamura T; Nagata D; Mori Y; Kawai N; Ogawa K; Akita H; Hashimoto Y; Tozawa K; Kohri K Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 21790224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Labanaris AP; Zugor V; Takriti S; Smiszek R; Engelhard K; Nutzel R; Kuhn R Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18759166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy. Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ability of preoperative 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging to predict the absence of side-specific extracapsular extension of prostate cancer. Hara T; Nakanishi H; Nakagawa T; Komiyama M; Kawahara T; Manabe T; Miyake M; Arai E; Kanai Y; Fujimoto H Int J Urol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):993-9. PubMed ID: 23360237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Lee SE; Hong SK; Han JH; Han BK; Yu JH; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee HJ Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 17382155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate. Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging as a marker of side-specific risk of extracapsular extension. Rosenkrantz AB; Chandarana H; Gilet A; Deng FM; Babb JS; Melamed J; Taneja SS J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):312-9. PubMed ID: 23238968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Yang R; Cao K; Han T; Zhang YF; Zhang GT; Xu LF; Lian HB; Li XG; Guo HQ Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 27004537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy. Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level]. Wetter A; Ajdukovic AN; Fliessbach K; Lehnert T; Engl T; Jacobi V; Vogl TJ Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16607587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy. Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate cancer: role of pretreatment multiparametric 3-T MRI in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Park JJ; Kim CK; Park SY; Park BK; Lee HM; Cho SW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):W459-65. PubMed ID: 24758681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent diffusion coefficient value is a strong predictor of unsuspected aggressiveness of prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. Renard Penna R; Cancel-Tassin G; Comperat E; Mozer P; Léon P; Varinot J; Roupret M; Bitker MO; Lucidarme O; Cussenot O World J Urol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1389-95. PubMed ID: 26902878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasion of the neurovascular bundle by prostate cancer: evaluation with MR imaging. Tempany CM; Rahmouni AD; Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Zerhouni EA Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 1887017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial experience with identifying high-grade prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in patients with a Gleason score ≤ 3 + 3 = 6 upon schematic TRUS-guided biopsy: a radical prostatectomy correlated series. Somford DM; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Fütterer JJ; van Oort IM; van Basten JP; Karthaus HF; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO Invest Radiol; 2012 Mar; 47(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 22293513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of MRI-Targeted in-Bore Prostate Biopsy According to the Gleason Score with Postprostatectomy Histopathologic Control--a Targeted Biopsy-Only Strategy with Limited Number of Cores. Garmer M; Busch M; Mateiescu S; Fahlbusch DE; Wagener B; Grönemeyer DH Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1409-18. PubMed ID: 26343218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Development of a preoperative criterion to select candidates for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy at Kyoto University Hospital]. Mizuno K; Inoue T; Miyazaki Y; Makino Y; Terada N; Kobayashi T; Yamasaki T; Matsui Y; Kamba T; Yoshimura K; Mikami Y; Ogawa O Hinyokika Kiyo; 2014 Nov; 60(11):543-7. PubMed ID: 25511940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Park BH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Jeon SS J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 24440235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of diffusional kurtosis imaging as a marker of adverse pathologic outcomes among prostate cancer active surveillance candidates undergoing radical prostatectomy. Rosenkrantz AB; Prabhu V; Sigmund EE; Babb JS; Deng FM; Taneja SS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 24059373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]