215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21790631)
1. Reinvestigations of six unusual paternity cases by typing of autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
Børsting C; Morling N
Transfusion; 2012 Feb; 52(2):425-30. PubMed ID: 21790631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mutations and/or close relatives? Six case work examples where 49 autosomal SNPs were used as supplementary markers.
Børsting C; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jun; 5(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 20457095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of the SNPforID 52 SNP-plex assay in paternity testing.
Børsting C; Sanchez JJ; Hansen HE; Hansen AJ; Bruun HQ; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19083839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A study on paternity testing with 96 autosomal SNPs].
Lee L; Wang L; Feng QC; Zhu YL; Cheng XL; Kong XD; Huang YM; Wang WF; Zeng ZS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 22311487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A SNaPshot assay for genotyping 44 individual identification single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Lou C; Cong B; Li S; Fu L; Zhang X; Feng T; Su S; Ma C; Yu F; Ye J; Pei L
Electrophoresis; 2011 Feb; 32(3-4):368-78. PubMed ID: 21298663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Kinship determination using DNA markers].
Jorquera G H; Acuña P M; Cifuentes L L
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Feb; 136(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18483673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An unusual case 0020 in paternity testing: nineteen autosomal short tandem repeat typing and 12 X-chromosome markers could not clarify the case.
Tabrizi AA; Hejazi A; Hosseini M
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2013 Dec; 34(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 24196725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Genplex SNP typing system and a 49plex forensic marker panel.
Phillips C; Fang R; Ballard D; Fondevila M; Harrison C; Hyland F; Musgrave-Brown E; Proff C; Ramos-Luis E; Sobrino B; Carracedo A; Furtado MR; Syndercombe Court D; Schneider PM;
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 19083752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinship investigation: a comparative analysis with STRs.
Amorim A; Pereira L
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 May; 150(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15837005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosing supplementary markers in forensic casework.
Tillmar AO; Mostad P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():128-33. PubMed ID: 25113577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Mo SK; Liu YC; Wang SQ; Bo XC; Li Z; Chen Y; Ni M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():161-168. PubMed ID: 26952733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing assay with 49 SNPs for forensic genetic testing in a laboratory accredited according to the ISO 17025 standard.
Børsting C; Rockenbauer E; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Dec; 4(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 19948332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the 124-plex SNP typing microarray for forensic testing.
Krjutskov K; Viltrop T; Palta P; Metspalu E; Tamm E; Suvi S; Sak K; Merilo A; Sork H; Teek R; Nikopensius T; Kivisild T; Metspalu A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Dec; 4(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 19948333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SNPs and MALDI-TOF MS: tools for DNA typing in forensic paternity testing and anthropology.
Petkovski E; Keyser-Tracqui C; Hienne R; Ludes B
J Forensic Sci; 2005 May; 50(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 15932083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining autosomal and Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat data in paternity testing with male child: methods and application.
Ayadi I; Mahfoudh-Lahiani N; Makni H; Ammar-Keskes L; Rebaï A
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1068-72. PubMed ID: 17645485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multiplex assay with 52 single nucleotide polymorphisms for human identification.
Sanchez JJ; Phillips C; Børsting C; Balogh K; Bogus M; Fondevila M; Harrison CD; Musgrave-Brown E; Salas A; Syndercombe-Court D; Schneider PM; Carracedo A; Morling N
Electrophoresis; 2006 May; 27(9):1713-24. PubMed ID: 16586411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new 39-plex analysis method for SNPs including 15 blood group loci.
Inagaki S; Yamamoto Y; Doi Y; Takata T; Ishikawa T; Imabayashi K; Yoshitome K; Miyaishi S; Ishizu H
Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Aug; 144(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 15240020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are needed to replace short tandem repeats (STRs) in forensic applications?
Lee HJ; Lee JW; Jeong SJ; Park M
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Sep; 131(5):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 28243773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of alternative batteries of genetic markers to complement autosomal STRs in kinship investigations: autosomal indels vs. X-chromosome STRs.
Gomes C; Magalhães M; Alves C; Amorim A; Pinto N; Gusmão L
Int J Legal Med; 2012 Nov; 126(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 22940765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
