BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

533 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21790743)

  • 1. Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations.
    Cushman F; Young L
    Cogn Sci; 2011 Aug; 35(6):1052-75. PubMed ID: 21790743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment.
    Cushman F
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):353-80. PubMed ID: 18439575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can unintended side effects be intentional? Resolving a controversy over intentionality and morality.
    Guglielmo S; Malle BF
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1635-47. PubMed ID: 21051767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect.
    Leslie AM; Knobe J; Cohen A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 May; 17(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 16683930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An FMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment.
    Young L; Saxe R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1396-405. PubMed ID: 18823250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moral appraisals affect doing/allowing judgments.
    Cushman F; Knobe J; Sinnott-Armstrong W
    Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):281-9. PubMed ID: 18377886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.
    Cushman F; Young L; Hauser M
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1082-9. PubMed ID: 17201791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mayan morality: an exploration of permissible harms.
    Abarbanell L; Hauser MD
    Cognition; 2010 May; 115(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 20092817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 21601839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enough skill to kill: intentionality judgments and the moral valence of action.
    Guglielmo S; Malle BF
    Cognition; 2010 Nov; 117(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 20813355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mind attributions about moral actors: intentionality is greater given coherent cues.
    Hughes JS; Trafimow D
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Jun; 54(2):220-35. PubMed ID: 24965741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural evidence for "intuitive prosecution": the use of mental state information for negative moral verdicts.
    Young L; Scholz J; Saxe R
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(3):302-15. PubMed ID: 21271462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The development of intent-based moral judgment.
    Cushman F; Sheketoff R; Wharton S; Carey S
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):6-21. PubMed ID: 23318350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The morality of harm.
    Sousa P; Holbrook C; Piazza J
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 19717146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of negligence, intention, and outcome on children's moral judgments.
    Nobes G; Panagiotaki G; Pawson C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Dec; 104(4):382-97. PubMed ID: 19740483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The sadistic trait predicts minimization of intention and causal responsibility in moral judgment.
    Trémolière B; Djeriouat H
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():158-71. PubMed ID: 26414248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time and moral judgment.
    Suter RS; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2011 Jun; 119(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 21354557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: an FMRI investigation.
    Schaich Borg J; Hynes C; Van Horn J; Grafton S; Sinnott-Armstrong W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):803-17. PubMed ID: 16768379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.
    Bartels DM
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):381-417. PubMed ID: 18486121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.