These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21790783)

  • 1. A critical assessment of the use of surrogate species in conservation planning in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California (U.S.A.).
    Murphy DD; Weiland PS; Cummins KW
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21790783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of surrogate taxa for the representation of biodiversity.
    Lewandowski AS; Noss RF; Parsons DR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1367-77. PubMed ID: 20455907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of surrogates to predict the stressor response of imperiled species.
    Wenger SJ
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1564-71. PubMed ID: 18680507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coral reef habitats as surrogates of species, ecological functions, and ecosystem services.
    Mumby PJ; Broad K; Brumbaugh DR; Dahlgren CP; Harborne AR; Hastings A; Holmes KE; Kappel CV; Micheli F; Sanchirico JN
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 18477024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of surrogate species in risk assessment: using life history data to safeguard against false negatives.
    Banks JE; Ackleh AS; Stark JD
    Risk Anal; 2010 Feb; 30(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 20136742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Haig SM; Beever EA; Chambers SM; Draheim HM; Dugger BD; Dunham S; Elliott-Smith E; Fontaine JB; Kesler DC; Knaus BJ; Lopes IF; Loschl P; Mullins TD; Sheffield LM
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1584-94. PubMed ID: 17181793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ants as a measure of effectiveness of habitat conservation planning in southern California.
    Mitrovich MJ; Matsuda T; Pease KH; Fisher RN
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1239-48. PubMed ID: 20337686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Planning, implementing, and monitoring multiple-species habitat conservation plans.
    Franklin J; Regan HM; Hierl LA; Deutschman DH; Johnson BS; Winchell CS
    Am J Bot; 2011 Mar; 98(3):559-71. PubMed ID: 21613147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
    Himes Boor GK
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The California Hotspots Project: identifying regions of rapid diversification of mammals.
    Davis EB; Koo MS; Conroy C; Patton JL; Moritz C
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):120-38. PubMed ID: 17725571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of a threatened-species focus on conservation planning.
    Drummond SP; Wilson KA; Meijaard E; Watts M; Dennis R; Christy L; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 19843123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts.
    Treves A; Wallace RB; White S
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1577-87. PubMed ID: 19459896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The route to best science in implementation of the Endangered Species Act's consultation mandate: the benefits of structured effects analysis.
    Murphy DD; Weiland PS
    Environ Manage; 2011 Feb; 47(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 21161526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation.
    Mawdsley JR; O'Malley R; Ojima DS
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Oct; 23(5):1080-9. PubMed ID: 19549219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A biological framework for evaluating whether a species is threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range.
    Waples RS; Adams PB; Bohnsack J; Taylor BL
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):964-74. PubMed ID: 17650247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered marine species: an application of stated preference choice experiments.
    Wallmo K; Lew DK
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1793-801. PubMed ID: 21392881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the value of the umbrella-species concept for conservation planning with meta-analysis.
    Branton M; Richardson JS
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 21091767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When should we save the most endangered species?
    Wilson HB; Joseph LN; Moore AL; Possingham HP
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Sep; 14(9):886-90. PubMed ID: 21749599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental diversity as a surrogate for species representation.
    Beier P; de Albuquerque FS
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1401-10. PubMed ID: 25864466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.