219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21790792)
1. Prostate cancer detection by prebiopsy 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
Nishida S; Kinoshita H; Mishima T; Kurokawa H; Sakaida N; Matsuda T
Int J Urol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):653-8. PubMed ID: 21790792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ability of preoperative 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging to predict the absence of side-specific extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.
Hara T; Nakanishi H; Nakagawa T; Komiyama M; Kawahara T; Manabe T; Miyake M; Arai E; Kanai Y; Fujimoto H
Int J Urol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):993-9. PubMed ID: 23360237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with unilateral prostate cancer on extended prostate biopsy: predictive accuracy of laterality and implications for hemi-ablative therapy.
Jeong IG; Kim JK; Cho KS; You D; Song C; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS
J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):1963-9. PubMed ID: 20851437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis.
Oto A; Yang C; Kayhan A; Tretiakova M; Antic T; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Karczmar GS; Stadler WM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90. PubMed ID: 22109293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phased array magnetic resonance imaging for staging clinically localised prostrate cancer.
Borre M; Lundorf E; Marcussen N; Langkilde NC; Wolf H
Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(6):589-92. PubMed ID: 16294442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Puech P; Potiron E; Lemaitre L; Leroy X; Haber GP; Crouzet S; Kamoi K; Villers A
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1094-9. PubMed ID: 19773038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative assessment of prostate cancer using prebiopsy MRI.
Min JH; Park BK; Park JJ; Park SY; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 25055269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does suspicion of prostate cancer on integrated T2 and diffusion-weighted MRI predict more adverse pathology on radical prostatectomy?
Borofsky MS; Rosenkrantz AB; Abraham N; Jain R; Taneja SS
Urology; 2013 Jun; 81(6):1279-83. PubMed ID: 23394882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Staging of prostate cancer: value of the combined information of endorectal MRI, biopsy Gleason score, and preoperative PSA level].
Wetter A; Ajdukovic AN; Fliessbach K; Lehnert T; Engl T; Jacobi V; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16607587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1165-70. PubMed ID: 15596191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?
Latchamsetty KC; Borden LS; Porter CR; Lacrampe M; Vaughan M; Lin E; Conti N; Wright JL; Corman JM
Can J Urol; 2007 Feb; 14(1):3429-34. PubMed ID: 17324322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PSA velocity is associated with gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen: marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Loeb S; Sutherland DE; D'Amico AV; Roehl KA; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1116-20; discussion 1120. PubMed ID: 18571700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
