BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21791902)

  • 21. Chapter 19: Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening.
    Goldie SJ; Kim JJ; Myers E
    Vaccine; 2006 Aug; 24 Suppl 3():S3/164-70. PubMed ID: 16950004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
    Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Cost effectiveness of cervical cancer screening strategies in Tunisia].
    Hsaïri M; Fakhfakh R; Ghyoula M; Ben Abdallah M; Achour N
    Tunis Med; 2000 Oct; 78(10):557-61. PubMed ID: 11190738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Encouraging underscreened women to have cervical cancer screening: the effectiveness of a computer strategy.
    Campbell E; Peterkin D; Abbott R; Rogers J
    Prev Med; 1997; 26(6):801-7. PubMed ID: 9388791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevention of cervical cancer in rural China: evaluation of HPV vaccination and primary HPV screening strategies.
    Canfell K; Shi JF; Lew JB; Walker R; Zhao FH; Simonella L; Chen JF; Legood R; Smith MA; Nickson C; Qiao YL
    Vaccine; 2011 Mar; 29(13):2487-94. PubMed ID: 21211586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stage of adoption and impact of direct-mail communications with and without phone intervention on Chinese women's cervical smear screening behavior.
    Hou SI
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):749-56. PubMed ID: 16120455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
    Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The health and economic impact of cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients.
    Wong G; Howard K; Webster A; Chapman JR; Craig JC
    Transplantation; 2009 Apr; 87(7):1078-91. PubMed ID: 19352131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Outcome and future of mass screening for uterine cervical cancer].
    Noda K; Tejima K
    Gan No Rinsho; 1983 May; 29(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 6410103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ["Cost-effectiveness" of cervical screening].
    Kostova P
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 17974169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preventing failed appointments in general dental practice: a comparison of reminder methods.
    Reekie D; Devlin H
    Br Dent J; 1998 Nov; 185(9):472-4. PubMed ID: 9854344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The balance of harms, benefits, and costs of screening for cervical cancer in older women: the case for continued screening.
    Mandelblatt J; Lawrence W; Yi B; King J
    Arch Intern Med; 2004 Feb; 164(3):245-7; discussion 247-8. PubMed ID: 14769618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas attending culturally specific educational programs.
    Jandorf L; Bursac Z; Pulley L; Trevino M; Castillo A; Erwin DO
    Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2008; 2(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 20208198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Randomized controlled trial comparing telephone and mail follow-up for recruitment of participants into a clinical trial of colorectal cancer screening.
    Wong AD; Kirby J; Guyatt GH; Moayyedi P; Vora P; You JJ
    Trials; 2013 Feb; 14():40. PubMed ID: 23399518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Promotion of cervical screening among nonattendees: a partial cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Oscarsson MG; Benzein EG; Wijma BE; Carlsson PG
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 18090130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pressing the key pad: trial of a novel approach to health promotion advice.
    Corkrey R; Parkinson L; Bates L
    Prev Med; 2005 Aug; 41(2):657-66. PubMed ID: 15917066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical screening in general practice - strategies for improving participation.
    Byrnes P; McGoldrick C; Crawford M; Peers M
    Aust Fam Physician; 2007 Mar; 36(3):183-4, 192. PubMed ID: 17339987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Organized cervical cancer screening for underpriviledged women].
    Piana L; Leandri FX; Jacqueme B; Heid P; Corti J; Andrac-Meyer L; Sancho-Garnier H
    Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 17535784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical cancer screening in the Ferrara Local Health Authority catchment area.
    Bergamini M; Buriani O; Cucchi A; De Togni A; Carpanelli MC; Cervato K; Gigli F; Pizzo F; Ravasini G; Rauli G; Rizzello R; Gregorio P
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2007 Dec; 48(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 18557309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.