122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21792495)
1. Minimum clinically important differences in the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: results from a national multicenter study of patients treated with anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis.
Skolasky RL; Albert TJ; Maggard AM; Riley LH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(14):1294-300. PubMed ID: 21792495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting health-utility scores from the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire in a multicenter nationwide study of anterior cervical spine surgery.
Skolasky RL; Carreon LY; Anderson PA; Albert TJ; Riley LH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):2211-6. PubMed ID: 21343870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.
Glassman SD; Copay AG; Berven SH; Polly DW; Subach BR; Carreon LY
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1839-47. PubMed ID: 18762642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive predictive factors and subgroup analysis of clinically relevant improvement after anterior cervical decompression and fusion for cervical disc disease: a 10- to 13-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study: clinical article.
Hermansen A; Hedlund R; Vavruch L; Peolsson A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Oct; 19(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 23909550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the visual analog scale in the cervical spine.
MacDowall A; Skeppholm M; Robinson Y; Olerud C
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):227-235. PubMed ID: 29243996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome of lumbar arthrodesis in patients sixty-five years of age or older. Surgical technique.
Glassman SD; Carreon L; Dimar JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 1():77-84. PubMed ID: 20194346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring surgical outcomes in subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease patients: minimum clinically important difference as a tool for determining meaningful clinical improvement.
Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Roitberg BZ
Neurosurgery; 2014 Feb; 74(2):206-13; discussion 213-4. PubMed ID: 24220005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.
Richardson SS; Berven S
Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22209244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Sasso RC; Anderson PA; Riew KD; Heller JG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(18):1684-92. PubMed ID: 21938372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Description of clinical outcomes and postoperative utilization of physical therapy services within 4 categories of shoulder surgery.
Brennan GP; Parent EC; Cleland JA
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 Jan; 40(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 20044703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric properties of the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire and its relationship to standard assessment tools used in spine research.
Skolasky RL; Riley LH; Albert TJ
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 17321966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of obesity on surgeon ratings and patient-reported outcome measures after degenerative cervical spine disease surgery.
Auffinger B; Lam S; Kraninger J; Shen J; Roitberg BZ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):e345-52. PubMed ID: 24145235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of minimum clinically important difference for assessing patients with subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease: statistical versus substantial clinical benefit.
Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Thaci B; Roitberg BZ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Dec; 155(12):2345-54; discussion 2355. PubMed ID: 24136679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinically important deterioration in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a choice of evaluation methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and pain scales: clinical article.
Gum JL; Glassman SD; Carreon LY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):564-8. PubMed ID: 24010900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
