These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21792621)
1. Comparison of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by monoplane cineventriculography, unenhanced echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Li C; Lossnitzer D; Katus HA; Buss SJ Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1003-10. PubMed ID: 21792621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of left ventricular volumes and function: a multicenter comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cine ventriculography, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography. Hoffmann R; Barletta G; von Bardeleben S; Vanoverschelde JL; Kasprzak J; Greis C; Becher H J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Mar; 27(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 24440110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of systolic left ventricular function: a multi-centre comparison of cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Hoffmann R; von Bardeleben S; ten Cate F; Borges AC; Kasprzak J; Firschke C; Lafitte S; Al-Saadi N; Kuntz-Hehner S; Engelhardt M; Becher H; Vanoverschelde JL Eur Heart J; 2005 Mar; 26(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 15618026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The discrepancy between echocardiography, cineventriculography and thermodilution. Evaluation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Takenaka A; Iwase M; Sobue T; Yokota M Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 8596064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of real-time full-volume 3D transthoracic echocardiography to measure LV volumes and systolic function: a fully automated endocardial contouring algorithm in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. Thavendiranathan P; Liu S; Verhaert D; Calleja A; Nitinunu A; Van Houten T; De Michelis N; Simonetti O; Rajagopalan S; Ryan T; Vannan MA JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 5(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 22421168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular volumes to full volume magnetic resonance imaging in normal and diseased rats. Arias T; Chen J; Fayad ZA; Fuster V; Hajjar RJ; Chemaly ER J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Aug; 26(8):910-8. PubMed ID: 23706342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative Assessment of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Kim J; Cohen SB; Atalay MK; Maslow AD; Poppas A Echocardiography; 2015 May; 32(5):805-12. PubMed ID: 25109323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Echoventriculography -- a simultaneous analysis of two-dimensional echocardiography and cineventriculography. Erbel R; Schweizer P; Lambertz H; Henn G; Meyer J; Krebs W; Effert S Circulation; 1983 Jan; 67(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 6847799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings. Busch S; Johnson TR; Wintersperger BJ; Minaifar N; Bhargava A; Rist C; Reiser MF; Becker C; Nikolaou K Eur Radiol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):570-5. PubMed ID: 17909817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Bellenger NG; Burgess MI; Ray SG; Lahiri A; Coats AJ; Cleland JG; Pennell DJ Eur Heart J; 2000 Aug; 21(16):1387-96. PubMed ID: 10952828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography in patients with valvular heart disease. Bak SH; Ko SM; Jeon HJ; Yang HS; Hwang HK; Song MG Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 22319133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard. Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography with unrestricted selection of imaging planes for measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Hibberd MG; Chuang ML; Beaudin RA; Riley MF; Mooney MG; Fearnside JT; Manning WJ; Douglas PS Am Heart J; 2000 Sep; 140(3):469-75. PubMed ID: 10966550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gated F-18 FDG PET for assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using QGS and 4D-MSPECT in patients with heart failure: a comparison with cardiac MRI. Li Y; Wang L; Zhao SH; He ZX; Wang DY; Guo F; Fang W; Yang MF PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e80227. PubMed ID: 24404123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements by high-definition blood flow imaging: Comparisons with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and contrast echocardiography. Ahmad M; Wu G; Frank L; Dimaano MM Echocardiography; 2020 Dec; 37(12):1975-1980. PubMed ID: 33091164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of Semi-automated Three-dimensional Volumetric Analysis using Cardiac Computed Tomography in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device. Gill GS; Weissman G; Meirovich YF; Medvedofsky D; Mohammed SF; Waksman R; Garcia-Garcia HM Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 May; 20(5):381-386. PubMed ID: 30772192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of right ventricular volumes in hypoplastic left heart syndrome by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Bell A; Rawlins D; Bellsham-Revell H; Miller O; Razavi R; Simpson J Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 15(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 23946284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sources of variation and bias in assessing left ventricular volumes and dyssynchrony using three-dimensional echocardiography. Muraru D; Badano LP; Ermacora D; Piccoli G; Iliceto S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1357-68. PubMed ID: 22120046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Left Ventricular Volumes and Function by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in Children with Functional Single Left Ventricle: A Comparison between QLAB and TomTec. Zhong SW; Zhang YQ; Chen LJ; Wang SS; Li WH Echocardiography; 2015 Oct; 32(10):1554-63. PubMed ID: 26099327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of regional left ventricular function by cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: a multicenter comparison of methods. Hoffmann R; von Bardeleben S; Kasprzak JD; Borges AC; ten Cate F; Firschke C; Lafitte S; Al-Saadi N; Kuntz-Hehner S; Horstick G; Greis C; Engelhardt M; Vanoverschelde JL; Becher H J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 47(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 16386674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]