These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21792798)

  • 1. Cochlear implant fixation using resorbable mesh.
    Lundy L; Karatayli-Ozgursoy S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2011 Jul; 90(7):306-12. PubMed ID: 21792798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implant fixation using polypropylene mesh and titanium screws.
    Davis BM; Labadie RF; McMenomey SO; Haynes DS
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Dec; 114(12):2116-8. PubMed ID: 15564830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear implant fixation using a subperiosteal tight pocket without either suture or bone-recess technique.
    Jethanamest D; Channer GA; Moss WJ; Lustig LR; Telischi FF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1674-7. PubMed ID: 24114870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.
    Sweeney AD; Carlson ML; Valenzuela CV; Wanna GB; Rivas A; Bennett ML; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Apr; 152(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 25605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimal access cochlear implant fixation: temporalis pocket with a plate.
    Shelton C; Warren FM
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1530-4. PubMed ID: 23064385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-sutured fixation of the internal receiver-stimulator in cochlear implantation.
    Boscolo-Rizzo P; Muzzi E; Barillari MR; Trabalzini F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 268(7):961-5. PubMed ID: 21221619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The outcome of our modified double-flap technique for cochlear implantation: a case series of 342 consecutive patients.
    Alzoubi F; Odat H; Al Omari A; Al-Zuraiqi B
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 25029104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear Implant Receiver-Stimulator Migration Using the Subperiosteal Pocket Technique: Objective Measurements of Early and Late Positioning.
    Maxwell AK; Cass SP
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 30742594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implant fixation: are sutures really necessary?
    Gekeler J; Luers JC; Lang-Roth R; Beutner D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 270(2):483-7. PubMed ID: 22476410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of receiver-stimulator migration in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique: a prospective clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Polat B; Enver N; Aydemir L; Çomoğlu Ş; Orhan KS
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Jun; 131(6):487-491. PubMed ID: 28290917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Device fixation and small incision access for pediatric cochlear implants.
    James AL; Papsin BC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 68(8):1017-22. PubMed ID: 15236887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in the Area Adjacent to the Internal Receiver-Stimulator of Cochlear Implant: A Retrospective Study.
    Aljazeeri I; Khurayzi T; Abdelsamad Y; Almuhawas F; Hagr A
    Curr Med Imaging; 2022; 18(2):249-255. PubMed ID: 34736387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of cochlear implant bed preparation and fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate.
    Pamuk AE; Pamuk G; Jafarov S; Bajin MD; Saraç S; Sennaroğlu L
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29888692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implant fixation in children using periosteal sutures.
    Adunka OF; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):768-70. PubMed ID: 17577130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fixation of cochlear implants: an evidence-based review of literature.
    de Varebeke SP; Govaerts P; Cox T; Deben K; Ketelslagers K; Waelkens B
    B-ENT; 2012; 8(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 22896927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The new Nucleus 5 model cochlear implant: a new surgical technique and early clinical results.
    Monksfield P; Husseman J; Cowan RS; O'Leary SJ; Briggs RJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Aug; 13(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 22333886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implantation with Pulsar Med El: a novel small incision technique.
    Cuda D
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2009 Apr; 29(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 20111616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multicenter evaluation of the digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients.
    Guevara N; Sterkers O; Bébéar JP; Meller R; Magnan J; Mosnier I; Amstutz I; Lerosey Y; Triglia JM; Roman S; Gahide I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2010 Aug; 119(8):501-5. PubMed ID: 20860274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The freiburg incision for cochlear implantation -- initial results].
    Aschendorff A; Jaekel K; Schipper J; Maier W; Laszig R; Klenzner T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Jun; 84(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15940571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New bone and fibrous tissue formation around ceramic cochlear implant receiver--stimulators and the measurement of their anchorage in the bony implant bed.
    Mlynski R; Rak K; Kaulitz S; Kraus F; Hagen R; Radeloff A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Nov; 15(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 24972625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.