These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21793644)

  • 1. Implementation and experience of a new method for posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite restorations in the private practice--a survey.
    Tauböck TT; Attin T; Schmidlin PR
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jul; 70(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 21793644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-year evaluation of posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite--a case series.
    Schmidlin PR; Filli T; Imfeld C; Tepper S; Attin T
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19192844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evaluation of direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition - clinical performance and patient satisfaction.
    Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Chana HS; Kelleher MG; Porter RW; Patel MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 May; 34(5):361-76. PubMed ID: 17441877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Materials and techniques for restoration of primary molars by pediatric dentists in Florida.
    Guelmann M; Mjör IA
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 12212875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National oral health survey Zimbabwe 1995: quality of restorations.
    Frencken JE; Sithole WD
    SADJ; 1998 Sep; 53(8):435-8. PubMed ID: 10518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations.
    Browning WD; Dennison JB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8957906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in material choice for posterior restorations in an Israeli dental school: composite resin versus amalgam.
    Ben-Gal G; Weiss EI
    J Dent Educ; 2011 Dec; 75(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 22184598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in material choice for direct restorations by final year students from University College Cork 2004-2009.
    O'Sullivan CO; McKenna GJ; Burke FM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 22474934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do clinical experience time and postgraduate training influence the choice of materials for posterior restorations? Results of a survey with Brazilian general dentists.
    Nascimento GG; Correa MB; Opdam N; Demarco FF
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(6):642-6. PubMed ID: 24474363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How well do fourth year Wits dental students place resin composite restorations?
    Lightfoot J; Clarke FM; Grossman ES
    SADJ; 2003 Mar; 58(2):56-61. PubMed ID: 12800265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
    Türkün LS; Aktener BO; Ateş M
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of chair side techniques for composite resin restoration--a survey.
    Fernandes AS; Rodrigues S; Singhal K; Murthi MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2003; 14(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 12800758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of full rehabilitations with direct composite in severe tooth wear patients: 3.5 Years results.
    Loomans BAC; Kreulen CM; Huijs-Visser HECE; Sterenborg BAMM; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MCDNJM; Opdam NJM
    J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():97-103. PubMed ID: 29339203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Composite vertical bite reconstructions in eroded dentitions after 5·5 years: a case series.
    Attin T; Filli T; Imfeld C; Schmidlin PR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Jan; 39(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 21827523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.