These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21793644)

  • 21. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changes in the treatment concept for approximal caries from 1983 to 2009 in Norway.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Espelid I
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 21412003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the mechanical and physical properties of a posterior resin composite in posterior adult teeth.
    Agbaje LO; Shaba OP; Adegbulugbe IC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Dec; 13(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 21220860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth.
    Grandini S; Goracci C; Tay FR; Grandini R; Ferrari M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 16220805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth.
    Bartlett D; Sundaram G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 17165303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations: contemporary teaching in U.S. and Canadian dental schools.
    Lynch CD; Blum IR; Frazier KB; Haisch LD; Wilson NH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22298557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Veiga Filho LC; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 11204001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics.
    Brunton PA; Christensen GJ; Cheung SW; Burke FJ; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jan; 198(2):99-103; discussion 89. PubMed ID: 15702109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A cohort investigation of the changes in vocational dental practitioners' views on repairing defective direct composite restorations.
    Blum IR; Newton JT; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2005 Sep; Suppl():27-30. PubMed ID: 16192929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems.
    Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of Solitaire-2 restorations placed in United Kingdom general dental practices: 1-year report.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Bell TJ; McDermott K; Lamb JJ; Siddons C; Weller B; Balkenhol M
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Sep; 34(8):594-9. PubMed ID: 14620210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Studies on posterior composite resins with special reference to class II restorations.
    Lundin SA
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 73():1-41. PubMed ID: 2264013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry.
    McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 71(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 15955263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.