These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21793918)
1. Grading of tarsal conjunctiva of young adults in Malaysia. Ishak B; Mohd-Ali B; Mohidin N Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Sep; 94(5):458-63. PubMed ID: 21793918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical grading of the upper palpebral conjunctiva of non-contact lens wearers. MacKinven J; McGuinness CL; Pascal E; Woods RL Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Jan; 78(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 11233330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of white and blue light assessment of the upper and lower palpebral conjunctiva. Kunnen C; Heunen M; Mertz C; Chalmers R; Soeters N; Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Dec; 41(6):473-481. PubMed ID: 30241905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia. Murphy PJ; Lau JS; Sim MM; Woods RL Eye (Lond); 2007 May; 21(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 16518366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinicopathological correlation of hard contact lens related changes in tarsal conjunctiva by impression cytology. Saini JS; Rajwanshi A; Dhar S Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1990 Feb; 68(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 2336936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales. Chong E; Simpson T; Fonn D Optom Vis Sci; 2000 May; 77(5):244-51. PubMed ID: 10831214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tarsal abnormalities: a new grading system. Lofstrom T; Anderson JS; Kruse A CLAO J; 1998 Oct; 24(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 9800059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing ocular bulbar redness: a comparison of methods. Downie LE; Keller PR; Vingrys AJ Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Mar; 36(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 26890702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contact lens wear and the development of squamous metaplasia of the surface cells of the conjunctiva. Doughty MJ Eye Contact Lens; 2011 Sep; 37(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 21808196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of papillary changes and folliculosis of the palpebral conjunctiva in asymptomatic Chinese children. Chan KY; Cho P; Chan YY; Cheung SW; Swann PG Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 23153728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Daily versus monthly disposable contact lens: Which is better for ocular surface physiology and comfort? Sapkota K; Franco S; Lira M Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Jun; 41(3):252-257. PubMed ID: 29221708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo confocal microscopy of trachoma in relation to normal tarsal conjunctiva. Hu VH; Massae P; Weiss HA; Cree IA; Courtright P; Mabey DC; Bailey RL; Burton MJ Ophthalmology; 2011 Apr; 118(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 21055819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses as an Indicator of Contact Lens Discomfort. Deng Z; Wang J; Jiang H; Fadli Z; Liu C; Tan J; Zhou J Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 170():197-205. PubMed ID: 27542928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Upper and lower conjunctival fornix depth in healthy white caucasian eyes: a method of objective assessment. Jutley G; Carpenter D; Hau S; Booth D; Jasim HA; Tay E; Daniel C; Saw V Eye (Lond); 2016 Oct; 30(10):1351-1358. PubMed ID: 27391932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of ocular redness measurements obtained with keratograph 5M and correlation with subjective grading scales. Pérez-Bartolomé F; Sanz-Pozo C; Martínez-de la Casa JM; Arriola-Villalobos P; Fernández-Pérez C; García-Feijoó J J Fr Ophtalmol; 2018 Nov; 41(9):836-846. PubMed ID: 30293826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of conjunctival changes in wearers of hard contact lenses. Korb DR; Allansmith MR; Greiner JV; Henriquez AS; Richmond PP; Finnemore VM Am J Ophthalmol; 1980 Sep; 90(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 7425049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]